Which returned more over the last year, IWF or VCSH?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +7.0% and VCSH returned +1.6%, so IWF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IWF or VCSH?

IWF charges 0.18% a year and VCSH charges 0.03%, so VCSH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWF vs VCSH: how they differ

IWF and VCSH hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWF returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWF and VCSH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWF	Only in VCSH
NVIDIA 15.46%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.85%
APPLE 7.77%	Bank of America Corp 0.24%
ALPHABET CLASS A 5.88%	AbbVie Inc 0.21%
MICROSOFT 5.55%	CVS Health Corp 0.21%
BROADCOM INC 5.10%	T-Mobile USA Inc 0.20%
ALPHABET CLASS C 4.77%	Boeing Co/The 0.20%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.52%	Wells Fargo & Co 0.18%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 3.35%	JPMorgan Chase & Co 0.18%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

IWF and VCSH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF	VCSH Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	Russell 1000 growth	Short-Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year	+7.0%	+1.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−10.5 pts	−15.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.18%	0.03%
Holdings	315	2999

IWF in plain words

IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 315 positions, with the top ten at 57.3%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VCSH in plain words

VCSH is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWF or VCSH?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +7.0% and VCSH returned +1.6%, so IWF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWF or VCSH?: IWF charges 0.18% a year and VCSH charges 0.03%, so VCSH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWF against VCSH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWF against VCSH, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-vcsh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources