Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWF vs VCSH: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWF returned +0.9% to VCSH's +1.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWF and VCSH
Net assets: $124.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF, and $43.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
VCSH costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points; IWF is 2.9 times larger.
| Measure | IWF | VCSH |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +0.9% | +1.3% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Growth Index | Bloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Corporate Bond Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $127.7bn | $43.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 94% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.5% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Dec 4, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026 · 881 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: IWF against VONG, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; VCSH against SCHJ, Oct 18, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026.
IWF returned more: +1,065.9% to +59.9%. VCSH swung less: 3.5% to 17.9%. VCSH fell less at its worst: −11.3% to −32.5%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IWF | VCSH | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +1,065.9% | +59.9% | IWF | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +15.6% | +2.8% | IWF | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +872.0% | +2.8% | IWF | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 17.9% | 3.5% | VCSH | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 12.1% | 2.5% | VCSH | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −32.5% | −11.3% | VCSH | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 99.8% | 98.3% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 100.1% | 98.3% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 1.00 | 0.95 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 1.00 | 0.99 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.81 | 0.37 | IWF | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.21 | 0.52 | IWF | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.149 | −0.003 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.48 | 0.25 | IWF | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | VONG | SCHJ | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −0.1% a year | 0.0% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −0.58 | −0.29 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −0.6% to +0.3% | −0.4% to +0.3% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | −0.11 | −0.06 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 1.0% | 0.5% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 881 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWF and VCSH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWF and VCSH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWF and VCSH do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. IWF follows Russell 1000 Growth Index and VCSH follows Bloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Corporate Bond Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- Number of holdings. IWF holds 374 positions and VCSH holds 3064.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IWF
IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
VCSH
VCSH tracks an index of Short-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested, against +1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Corporate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWF or VCSH?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +0.9% and VCSH +1.3%.
- Which is cheaper, IWF or VCSH?
- VCSH is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWF against VCSH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-vcsh
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWF against VCSH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-vcsh
[IWF against VCSH (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-vcsh)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.