Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BNDX vs IWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BNDX returned −0.9% to IWO's +7.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BNDX and IWO

Net assets: $82.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF, and $14.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
−0.9%
BNDX total return, 1 year
+7.9%
IWO total return, 1 year
0.07%
BNDX expense ratio
0.24%
IWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BNDX costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.8 points; BNDX is 5.9 times larger.

BNDX vs IWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBNDXIWO
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.9%+7.9%
Drawdown
Below its high9.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged)Russell 2000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.07%0.24%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$82.9bn$14.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund6.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BNDX and IWO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BNDX IWO
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BNDX
MKTLIQ 0.93%
United Kingdom Gilt 0.39%
French Republic Government Bond OAT 0.35%
United Kingdom Gilt 0.35%
French Republic Government Bond OAT 0.35%
United Kingdom Gilt 0.34%
United Kingdom Gilt 0.33%
French Republic Government Bond OAT 0.31%
Only in IWO
JFROG 0.74%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.71%
GLAUKOS 0.70%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.68%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.66%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.61%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.60%
INTERDIGITAL INC 0.58%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Total International Bond Tracks the Russell 2000 Growth
Total return, 1 year −0.9% +7.9%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +8.0% (VTWG)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.1 pts vs VTWG
Expense ratio 0.07% 0.24%
Holdings 6840 1122
Net assets, BNDX as of Sep 30, 2026 and IWO as of Oct 27, 2026 $82.9bn $14.0bn

BNDX and IWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BNDX

BNDX tracks an index of Total International Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.

IWO

IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +8.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,122 positions, with the top ten at 6.4%. It sat 9.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BNDX or IWO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BNDX returned −0.9% and IWO +7.9%.
Which is cheaper, BNDX or IWO?
BNDX is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BNDX against IWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bndx-vs-iwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.