Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWO vs VCSH: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWO returned +7.9% to VCSH's +1.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWO and VCSH

Net assets: $14.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF, and $43.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF.

At a glance
+7.9%
IWO total return, 1 year
+1.3%
VCSH total return, 1 year
0.24%
IWO expense ratio
0.03%
VCSH expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VCSH costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.6 points; VCSH is 3.1 times larger.

IWO vs VCSH: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWOVCSH
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.9%+1.3%
Drawdown
Below its high9.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 Growth IndexBloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Corporate Bond Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.24%0.03%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$14.1bn$43.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund6.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWO and VCSH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWO VCSH
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWO
JFROG 0.74%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.71%
GLAUKOS 0.70%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.68%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.66%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.61%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.60%
INTERDIGITAL INC 0.58%
Only in VCSH
MKTLIQ 0.68%
Bank of America Corp 0.23%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 0.22%
CVS Health Corp 0.20%
AbbVie Inc 0.20%
Amazon.com Inc 0.19%
Boeing Co 0.19%
T-Mobile USA Inc 0.19%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF VCSH Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Tracks an index of Short-Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year +7.9% +1.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +8.0% (VTWG) +1.3% (SCHJ)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VTWG 0.0 pts vs SCHJ
Expense ratio 0.24% 0.03%
Holdings 1122 3064
Net assets, IWO as of Oct 27, 2026 and VCSH as of Sep 30, 2026 $14.0bn $43.9bn

IWO and VCSH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWO

IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +8.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,122 positions, with the top ten at 6.4%. It sat 9.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VCSH

VCSH tracks an index of Short-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested, against +1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Corporate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWO or VCSH?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWO returned +7.9% and VCSH +1.3%.
Which is cheaper, IWO or VCSH?
VCSH is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWO against VCSH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwo-vs-vcsh

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.