Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
AGG vs MOAT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AGG returned −1.4% to MOAT's +10.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about AGG and MOAT
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $139.4bn for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and $11.6bn for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF.
Pair scorecard
AGG costs 0.43 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.7 points; AGG is 12.0 times larger.
| Measure | AGG | MOAT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.4% | +10.3% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Aug 4, 2020 | 3.7%, high on Aug 27, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index | Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.46% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $139.4bn | $11.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 92% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 26.5% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, AGG and MOAT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
AGG and MOAT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AGG
AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
MOAT
MOAT tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.3% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 54 positions, with the top ten at 26.5%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AGG or MOAT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −1.4% and MOAT +10.3%.
- Which is cheaper, AGG or MOAT?
- AGG is cheaper, by 0.43 percentage points a year. That is about $43 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AGG against MOAT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-moat
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). AGG against MOAT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-moat
[AGG against MOAT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-moat)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.