Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BND vs MOAT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BND returned −1.3% to MOAT's +10.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BND and MOAT

Net assets: $161.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF, and $11.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF.

At a glance
−1.3%
BND total return, 1 year
+10.3%
MOAT total return, 1 year
0.03%
BND expense ratio
0.46%
MOAT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BND costs 0.43 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.6 points.

BND vs MOAT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBNDMOAT
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.3%+10.3%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Aug 6, 20203.7%, high on Aug 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted IndexMorningstar Wide Moat Focus Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.46%
Net assets, BND as of Sep 30, 2026 and MOAT as of Oct 27, 2026$161.4bn$11.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight92%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund26.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

May 4, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026 · 755 weekly returns
BND MOAT
Return
Total return edge MOAT +28.4% +559.2%
Annualized edge MOAT +1.7% +13.9%
Price return edge MOAT −15.2% +453.0%
Risk
Volatility edge BND 4.7% 17.1%
Max drawdown edge BND −18.4% −30.8%
Downside capture 95.6% 100.0%
Beta 0.91 0.98
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MOAT 0.01 0.74
Sortino edge MOAT 0.02 1.10
Treynor 0.016 0.130
Calmar edge MOAT 0.09 0.45
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.2% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.59 −0.06
Information ratio 0.03 −0.05
Tracking error 1.3% 7.6%

Each against its own benchmark: BND against AGG, Apr 20, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026; MOAT against VOO, May 4, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

MOAT returned more: +559.2% to +28.4%. BND swung less: 4.7% to 17.1%. BND fell less at its worst: −18.4% to −30.8%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: BND vs MOAT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBNDMOATEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+28.4%+559.2%MOATPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+1.7%+13.9%MOATTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−15.2%+453.0%MOATPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility4.7%17.1%BNDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation3.4%11.6%BNDLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−18.4%−30.8%BNDDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture95.8%98.2%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture95.6%100.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.910.98Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.940.81Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.010.74MOATReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.021.10MOATReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0160.130Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.090.45MOATAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkAGGVOOThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.2% a year−0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.59−0.06Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.4% to +0.7%−4.0% to +3.8%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.03−0.05Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.3%7.6%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 755 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BND and MOAT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BND MOAT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BND
MKTLIQ 0.92%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.40%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.39%
Only in MOAT
Danaher Corp 2.85%
Microsoft Corp 2.81%
Estee Lauder Cos Inc 2.78%
Tyler Technologies Inc 2.73%
Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc 2.65%
Brown-Forman Corp 2.57%
Kenvue Inc 2.57%
Ge Healthcare Technologies Inc 2.55%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat
Total return, 1 year −1.3% +10.3%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs AGG −3.4 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.46%
Holdings 16301 54
Net assets, BND as of Sep 30, 2026 and MOAT as of Oct 27, 2026 $161.4bn $11.6bn

BND and MOAT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-7756AD4744

BND and MOAT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. BND follows Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index and MOAT follows Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BND returned −1.3% and MOAT +10.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.6 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

MOAT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BND

BND tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, measured by the closely related Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 6, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

MOAT

MOAT tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.3% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 54 positions, with the top ten at 26.5%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BND or MOAT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned −1.3% and MOAT +10.3%.
Which is cheaper, BND or MOAT?
BND is cheaper, by 0.43 percentage points a year. That is about $43 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BND against MOAT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-moat

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.