Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BND vs IJH: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BND returned −1.3% to IJH's +13.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BND and IJH

Net assets: $161.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF, and $122.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF.

At a glance
−1.3%
BND total return, 1 year
+13.2%
IJH total return, 1 year
0.03%
BND expense ratio
0.05%
IJH expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BND costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.5 points; BND is 1.3 times larger.

BND vs IJH: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBNDIJH
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.3%+13.2%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Aug 6, 20206.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted IndexS&P MidCap 400
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.05%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$161.4bn$120.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund7.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BND and IJH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BND IJH
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BND
MKTLIQ 0.92%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.40%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.39%
Only in IJH
OKTA CLASS A 1.10%
TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.82%
UNITED THERAPEUTICS 0.74%
ENTEGRIS INC 0.67%
ATI 0.66%
US FOODS HOLDING 0.65%
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM 0.65%
XPO 0.64%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Tracks the S&P MidCap 400
Total return, 1 year −1.3% +13.2%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) +12.8% (MDY)
Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs AGG +0.4 pts vs MDY
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.05%
Holdings 16301 409
Net assets, BND as of Sep 30, 2026 and IJH as of Oct 27, 2026 $161.4bn $122.8bn

BND and IJH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IJH flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BND

BND tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, measured by the closely related Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 6, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

IJH

IJH tracks the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.2% with distributions reinvested, against +12.8% for its benchmark, the S&P MidCap 400. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 409 positions, with the top ten at 7.2%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BND or IJH?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned −1.3% and IJH +13.2%.
Which is cheaper, BND or IJH?
BND is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BND against IJH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-ijh

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.