Which returned more over the last year, FXI or IGSB?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −13.8% and IGSB returned +1.7%, so IGSB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FXI or IGSB?

FXI charges 0.73% a year and IGSB charges 0.04%, so IGSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FXI vs IGSB: how they differ

FXI and IGSB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IGSB returned more over the year.

iShares China Large-Cap ETF and iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FXI and IGSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FXI and IGSB both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding	FXI	IGSB
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF	6.56%	0.01%

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FXI	Only in IGSB
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 9.88%	BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.56%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 9.14%	EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO S. R.L. 144A 0.29%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 8.34%	SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 144A 0.15%
XIAOMI 4.83%	DEUTSCHE TELEKOM INTERNATIONAL FIN 0.10%
MEITUAN 4.36%	BAYER US FINANCE II LLC 144A 0.09%
BANK OF CHINA LTD H 4.32%	JPMORGAN CHASE & CO MTN 0.09%
PING AN INSURANCE (GROUP) CO OF CH 3.80%	GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA (FXD-FRN) 0.08%
NETEASE 3.56%	GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC/THE MTN 0.08%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

FXI and IGSB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF	IGSB iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	China Large-Cap	1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year	−13.8%	+1.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−31.3 pts	−15.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.73%	0.04%
Holdings	53	4496

FXI in plain words

FXI is an index equity fund tracking the China Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%. It sat 28.5% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

IGSB in plain words

IGSB is a bond fund tracking the 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FXI or IGSB?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −13.8% and IGSB returned +1.7%, so IGSB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FXI or IGSB?: FXI charges 0.73% a year and IGSB charges 0.04%, so IGSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FXI against IGSB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FXI against IGSB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxi-vs-igsb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources