Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FXI vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FXI returned −19.1% to MAGS's +5.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FXI and MAGS

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $3.7bn for iShares China Large-Cap ETF and $5.5bn for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

At a glance
−19.1%
FXI total return, 1 year
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
0.73%
FXI expense ratio
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MAGS costs 0.43 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 24.9 points; MAGS is 1.5 times larger.

FXI vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFXIMAGS
Return
Total return, 1 year−19.1%+5.8%
Drawdown
Below its high32.7%, high on Feb 17, 20214.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksFTSE China 50 IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.73%0.30%
Net assets$3.7bn$5.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund58.4%29.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FXI and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FXI MAGS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FXI
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 9.81%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 8.63%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 8.60%
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF 6.69%
XIAOMI 4.86%
BANK OF CHINA LTD H 4.76%
MEITUAN 4.58%
NETEASE 3.85%
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
NVIDIA Corp 3.52%
Apple Inc 3.49%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48%
Tesla Inc 3.45%
Microsoft Corp 3.07%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 2.45%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of China Large-Cap Actively managed
Total return, 1 year −19.1% +5.8%
Expense ratio 0.73% 0.30%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 22.5%
Holdings 51 8
Net assets $3.7bn $5.5bn

FXI and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

FXI and MAGS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FXI

FXI tracks an index of China Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −19.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 58.4%. It sat 32.7% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FXI or MAGS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXI returned −19.1% and MAGS +5.8%.
Which is cheaper, FXI or MAGS?
MAGS is cheaper, by 0.43 percentage points a year. That is about $43 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FXI and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FXI and 22% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FXI against MAGS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxi-vs-mags

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.