Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MAGS vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MAGS returned +5.8% to URTH's +13.1%; 18% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MAGS and URTH

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $5.5bn for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and $8.9bn for iShares MSCI World ETF.

At a glance
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
+13.1%
URTH total return, 1 year
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio
0.24%
URTH expense ratio

Pair scorecard

URTH costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.3 points; URTH is 1.6 times larger.

MAGS vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMAGSURTH
Return
Total return, 1 year+5.8%+13.1%
Drawdown
Below its high4.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI World Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.30%0.24%
Net assets$5.5bn$8.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common18%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.3%27.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

18%

By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and URTH hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

18% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MAGS URTH
NVIDIA Corp 3.52% 5.50%
Apple Inc 3.49% 5.60%
Microsoft Corp 3.07% 4.12%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48% 2.69%
Alphabet Inc 2.45% 2.07%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04% 1.49%
Tesla Inc 3.45% 1.28%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
Only in URTH
BROADCOM INC 1.70%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.62%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.15%
ELI LILLY 1.13%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.00%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 0.98%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 0.84%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 0.82%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF URTH iShares MSCI World ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the MSCI World
Total return, 1 year +5.8% +13.1%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.4% (ACWI)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.3 pts vs ACWI
Expense ratio 0.30% 0.24%
Already in the S&P 500 22.5% 69.1%
Holdings 8 1254
Net assets $5.5bn $8.9bn

MAGS and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

MAGS and URTH flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

URTH

URTH tracks the MSCI World. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 69% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,254 positions, with the top ten at 27.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or URTH?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +5.8% and URTH +13.1%.
Which is cheaper, MAGS or URTH?
URTH is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MAGS and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 22% of MAGS and 69% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MAGS against URTH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-urth

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.