Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MGK vs URTH: how they differ
MGK and URTH hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and URTH returned more over the year.
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund and iShares MSCI World ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MGK and URTH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MGK | Only in URTH |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 13.29% | NVIDIA 5.52% |
| Apple Inc 12.19% | APPLE 5.28% |
| Microsoft Corp 7.52% | MICROSOFT 3.82% |
| Alphabet Inc 5.93% | AMAZON.COM INC 2.67% |
| Alphabet Inc 4.67% | ALPHABET CLASS A 2.14% |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.47% | BROADCOM INC 1.79% |
| Broadcom Inc 4.28% | ALPHABET CLASS C 1.70% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 4.08% | META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.56% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund | URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | iShares |
| What it is | Mega Cap Growth | MSCI World |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.9% | +17.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −2.6 pts | −0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.24% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 99.2% | 70.3% |
| Holdings | 56 | 1230 |
MGK in plain words
MGK is an index equity fund tracking the Mega Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 56 positions, with the top ten at 63.8%.
URTH in plain words
URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1230 positions, with the top ten at 26.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MGK or URTH?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MGK returned +14.9% and URTH returned +17.4%, so URTH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MGK or URTH?
- MGK charges 0.07% a year and URTH charges 0.24%, so MGK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do MGK and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of MGK and 70% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MGK against URTH, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mgk-vs-urth Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources