Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AOR vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AOR returned +7.8% to URTH's +13.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AOR and URTH

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $3.9bn for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF and $8.9bn for iShares MSCI World ETF.

At a glance
+7.8%
AOR total return, 1 year
+13.1%
URTH total return, 1 year
0.15%
AOR expense ratio
0.24%
URTH expense ratio

Pair scorecard

AOR costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.3 points; URTH is 2.3 times larger.

AOR vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAORURTH
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.8%+13.1%
Benchmark
What it tracks60/40 Balanced AllocationMSCI World Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.24%
Net assets$3.9bn$8.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund99.9%27.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, AOR and URTH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AOR URTH
Only in one fund ↓
Only in AOR
ISHARES CORE S&P ETF TRUST 35.70%
ISHARES CORE UNIV USD BOND ETF 32.15%
ISHARES CORE MSCI INT DEVEL ETF 17.10%
ISHARES CORE MSCI EMERGING MARKETS 6.34%
iShares Core Intl Aggregate Bnd ET 5.81%
ISHARES CORE S&P MID-CAP ETF 1.89%
ISHARES CORE S&P SMALL-CAP ETF 0.92%
Only in URTH
APPLE 5.60%
NVIDIA 5.50%
MICROSOFT 4.12%
AMAZON.COM INC 2.69%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.07%
BROADCOM INC 1.70%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.62%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.49%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF URTH iShares MSCI World ETF
Where it sits Allocation ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of 60/40 Balanced Allocation Tracks the MSCI World
Total return, 1 year +7.8% +13.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.4% (ACWI) +13.4% (ACWI)
Gap to its benchmark −5.6 pts vs ACWI −0.3 pts vs ACWI
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.24%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 69.1%
Holdings 7 1254
Net assets $3.9bn $8.9bn

AOR and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

AOR and URTH flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AOR

AOR tracks an index of 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 99.9%.

URTH

URTH tracks the MSCI World. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 69% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,254 positions, with the top ten at 27.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AOR or URTH?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +7.8% and URTH +13.1%.
Which is cheaper, AOR or URTH?
AOR is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AOR and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AOR and 69% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AOR against URTH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-urth

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.