Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IYR vs URTH: how they differ

IYR and URTH hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and URTH returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF and iShares MSCI World ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IYR and URTH hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IYR and URTH both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIYRURTH
WELLTOWER11.49%0.18%
PROLOGIS REIT8.99%0.14%
EQUINIX REIT4.57%0.11%
AMERICAN TOWER REIT4.16%0.09%
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY0.10%0.09%
DIGITAL REALTY TRUST REIT4.86%0.08%
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP REIT INC4.46%0.07%
REALTY INCOME REIT4.19%0.06%
CBRE GROUP CLASS A3.05%0.05%
PUBLIC STORAGE REIT3.73%0.05%
USD CASH0.12%0.05%
VENTAS REIT3.32%0.05%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IYROnly in URTH
JONES LANG LASALLE 1.20%NVIDIA 5.52%
HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES INC 1.06%APPLE 5.28%
HOST HOTELS & RESORTS REIT 1.06%MICROSOFT 3.82%
OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS REIT 1.06%AMAZON.COM INC 2.67%
LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY CLAS 0.97%ALPHABET CLASS A 2.14%
COSTAR GROUP 0.91%BROADCOM INC 1.79%
AGNC INVESTMENT REIT 0.88%ALPHABET CLASS C 1.70%
EQUITY LIFESTYLE PROPERTIES REIT I 0.88%META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

IYR and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IYR
iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isU.S. Real EstateMSCI World
Total return, 1 year+4.7%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−12.8 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.37%0.24%
Already in the S&P 50080.4%70.3%
Holdings631230

IYR in plain words

IYR is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Real Estate. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 63 positions, with the top ten at 53.4%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

URTH in plain words

URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1230 positions, with the top ten at 26.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IYR or URTH?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYR returned +4.7% and URTH returned +17.4%, so URTH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IYR or URTH?
IYR charges 0.37% a year and URTH charges 0.24%, so URTH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IYR and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 80% of IYR and 70% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IYR against URTH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IYR against URTH, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iyr-vs-urth Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources