Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
KRE vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, KRE returned +21.2% to URTH's +13.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about KRE and URTH
Net assets: $4.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF, and $8.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI World ETF.
Pair scorecard
URTH costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.1 points; URTH is 2.1 times larger.
| Measure | KRE | URTH |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +21.2% | +13.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 6.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index | MSCI World Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.24% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $4.2bn | $8.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 11.6% | 27.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jan 20, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026 · 770 weekly returnsURTH returned more: +421.6% to +284.1%. URTH swung less: 15.6% to 27.7%. URTH fell less at its worst: −32.7% to −52.6%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | KRE | URTH | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +284.1% | +421.6% | URTH | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +9.5% | +11.8% | URTH | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +173.8% | +296.2% | URTH | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 27.7% | 15.6% | URTH | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 18.9% | 10.9% | URTH | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −52.6% | −32.7% | URTH | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.40 | 0.68 | URTH | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.59 | 0.97 | URTH | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.18 | 0.36 | URTH | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 770 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, KRE and URTH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
KRE and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
KRE and URTH do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. KRE follows S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index and URTH follows MSCI World Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 KRE returned +21.2% and URTH +13.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.1 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
KRE
KRE tracks the S&P Regional Banking. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 167 positions, with the top ten at 11.6%. It sat 6.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
URTH
URTH tracks the MSCI World. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 69% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,254 positions, with the top ten at 27.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, KRE or URTH?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, KRE returned +21.2% and URTH +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, KRE or URTH?
- URTH is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, KRE against URTH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/kre-vs-urth
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). KRE against URTH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/kre-vs-urth
[KRE against URTH (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/kre-vs-urth)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.