Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs IYR: how they differ

ACWI and IYR hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and ACWI returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and IYR hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWI and IYR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWIIYR
WELLTOWER0.16%11.49%
PROLOGIS REIT0.12%8.99%
EQUINIX REIT0.10%4.57%
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY0.10%0.10%
AMERICAN TOWER REIT0.08%4.16%
DIGITAL REALTY TRUST REIT0.07%4.86%
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP REIT INC0.06%4.46%
PUBLIC STORAGE REIT0.05%3.73%
REALTY INCOME REIT0.05%4.19%
VIVMARK RESIDENTIAL0.05%3.59%
CBRE GROUP CLASS A0.04%3.05%
VENTAS REIT0.04%3.32%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWIOnly in IYR
NVIDIA 4.89%JONES LANG LASALLE 1.20%
APPLE 4.67%HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES INC 1.06%
MICROSOFT 3.38%HOST HOTELS & RESORTS REIT 1.06%
AMAZON.COM INC 2.38%OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS REIT 1.06%
ALPHABET CLASS A 1.90%LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY CLAS 0.97%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 1.86%COSTAR GROUP 0.91%
BROADCOM INC 1.59%AGNC INVESTMENT REIT 0.88%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.50%EQUITY LIFESTYLE PROPERTIES REIT I 0.88%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

ACWI and IYR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
IYR
iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isMSCI ACWIU.S. Real Estate
Total return, 1 year+19.1%+4.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts−12.8 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.37%
Already in the S&P 50061.4%80.4%
Holdings163063

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1630 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

IYR in plain words

IYR is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Real Estate. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 63 positions, with the top ten at 53.4%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or IYR?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and IYR returned +4.7%, so ACWI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or IYR?
ACWI charges 0.32% a year and IYR charges 0.37%, so ACWI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and IYR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 80% of IYR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against IYR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against IYR, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-iyr Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources