Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
ACWX vs URTH: how they differ
ACWX and URTH hold 27% of their weight in the same names, and ACWX returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF and iShares MSCI World ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACWX and URTH hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ACWX | URTH |
|---|---|---|
| ASML HOLDING | 1.77% | 0.73% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC | 0.94% | 0.39% |
| ROYAL BANK OF CANADA | 0.76% | 0.32% |
| SHELL PLC | 0.70% | 0.29% |
| MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP | 0.67% | 0.28% |
| NOVARTIS AG | 0.67% | 0.28% |
| ASTRAZENECA PLC | 0.63% | 0.27% |
| NESTLE SA | 0.65% | 0.27% |
| BHP GROUP LTD | 0.61% | 0.25% |
| SIEMENS N AG | 0.58% | 0.24% |
| TORONTO DOMINION | 0.53% | 0.22% |
| ALLIANZ | 0.51% | 0.21% |
| Only in ACWX | Only in URTH |
|---|---|
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 5.09% | NVIDIA 5.52% |
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 2.50% | APPLE 5.28% |
| SK HYNIX 2.04% | MICROSOFT 3.82% |
| TENCENT HOLDINGS 0.88% | AMAZON.COM INC 2.67% |
| ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 0.61% | ALPHABET CLASS A 2.14% |
| MEDIATEK 0.57% | BROADCOM INC 1.79% |
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 0.32% | ALPHABET CLASS C 1.70% |
| CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 0.29% | META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.56% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | MSCI ACWI ex U.S. | MSCI World |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.0% | +17.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5.5 pts | −0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.24% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 70.3% |
| Holdings | 1515 | 1230 |
ACWX in plain words
ACWX is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1515 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%.
URTH in plain words
URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1230 positions, with the top ten at 26.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or URTH?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +23.0% and URTH returned +17.4%, so ACWX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, ACWX or URTH?
- ACWX charges 0.32% a year and URTH charges 0.24%, so URTH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do ACWX and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ACWX and 70% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 27% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWX against URTH, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-urth Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources