Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FENI vs URTH: how they differ

FENI and URTH hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FENI returned more over the year.

Fidelity Enhanced International ETF and iShares MSCI World ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FENI and URTH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FENI and URTH both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFENIURTH
DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD0.22%0.14%
RENESAS ELECTRONICS CORP0.30%0.04%
UNITED OVERSEAS BANK LTD0.31%0.04%
BOC HONG KONG HOLDINGS LTD0.35%0.03%
DISCO CORP0.21%0.03%
BANDAI NAMCO HOLDINGS INC0.36%0.02%
DAIWA SECURITIES GROUP INC0.47%0.02%
MITSUBISHI ESTATE CO LTD0.02%0.03%
SUN HUNG KAI PROPERTIES LTD0.16%0.02%
CK ASSET HOLDINGS LTD0.12%0.01%
DEUTSCHE BOERSE AG0.01%0.07%
GEA GROUP AG0.04%0.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FENIOnly in URTH
ASML HOLDING NV 4.11%NVIDIA 5.52%
NESTLE SA 1.77%APPLE 5.28%
SIEMENS AG 1.63%MICROSOFT 3.82%
TOKYO ELECTRON LTD 1.46%AMAZON.COM INC 2.67%
ABB LTD 1.34%ALPHABET CLASS A 2.14%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.33%BROADCOM INC 1.79%
IBERDROLA SA 1.23%ALPHABET CLASS C 1.70%
BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA S.A 1.22%META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

FENI and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FENI
Fidelity Enhanced International ETF
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityiShares
What it isEnhanced InternationalMSCI World
Total return, 1 year+19.4%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.9 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.24%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%70.3%
Holdings3921230

FENI in plain words

FENI is an index equity fund tracking the Enhanced International. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 392 positions, with the top ten at 16.7%.

URTH in plain words

URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1230 positions, with the top ten at 26.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FENI or URTH?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FENI returned +19.4% and URTH returned +17.4%, so FENI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FENI or URTH?
FENI charges 0.28% a year and URTH charges 0.24%, so URTH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FENI and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FENI and 70% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FENI against URTH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FENI against URTH, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/feni-vs-urth Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources