Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IEFA vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IEFA returned +12.3% to URTH's +13.1%; 24% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IEFA and URTHNet assets on Oct 28, 2026: $190.4bn for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF and $8.9bn for iShares MSCI World ETF.
Pair scorecard
IEFA costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.8 points; IEFA is far larger, $190.4bn against $8.9bn.
| Measure | IEFA | URTH |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +12.3% | +13.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.7%, high on Aug 25, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI EAFE IMI Index | MSCI World Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.24% |
| Net assets | $190.4bn | $8.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 24% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 12.3% | 27.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IEFA and URTH hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
24% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IEFA and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IEFA
IEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,629 positions, with the top ten at 12.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
URTH
URTH tracks the MSCI World. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 69% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,254 positions, with the top ten at 27.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IEFA or URTH?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEFA returned +12.3% and URTH +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, IEFA or URTH?
- IEFA is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IEFA against URTH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iefa-vs-urth
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IEFA against URTH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iefa-vs-urth
[IEFA against URTH (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iefa-vs-urth)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.