Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AGG vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AGG returned −1.4% to URTH's +13.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AGG and URTH

Net assets: $139.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF, and $8.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI World ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
AGG total return, 1 year
+13.1%
URTH total return, 1 year
0.03%
AGG expense ratio
0.24%
URTH expense ratio

Pair scorecard

AGG costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.5 points; AGG is 15.8 times larger.

AGG vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAGGURTH
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+13.1%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond IndexMSCI World Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.24%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$139.4bn$8.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight69%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund27.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, AGG and URTH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AGG URTH
Only in one fund ↓
Only in AGG
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 3.02%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE (OLD) 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.38%
Only in URTH
APPLE 5.60%
NVIDIA 5.50%
MICROSOFT 4.12%
AMAZON.COM INC 2.69%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.07%
BROADCOM INC 1.70%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.62%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.49%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF URTH iShares MSCI World ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Tracks the MSCI World
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +13.1%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.3% (SCHZ) +13.4% (ACWI)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs SCHZ −0.3 pts vs ACWI
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.24%
Holdings 13469 1254
Net assets, AGG as of Oct 27, 2026 and URTH as of Oct 28, 2026 $139.4bn $8.9bn

AGG and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

AGG and URTH flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AGG

AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

URTH

URTH tracks the MSCI World. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 69% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,254 positions, with the top ten at 27.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AGG or URTH?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −1.4% and URTH +13.1%.
Which is cheaper, AGG or URTH?
AGG is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AGG against URTH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-urth

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.