Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
ACWI vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ACWI returned +13.4% to URTH's +13.1%; 88% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ACWI and URTH
Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $33.0bn for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and $8.9bn for iShares MSCI World ETF.
Pair scorecard
URTH costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points; ACWI is 3.7 times larger.
| Measure | ACWI | URTH |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.4% | +13.1% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI ACWI | MSCI World Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.24% |
| Net assets | $33.0bn | $8.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 88% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 24.9% | 27.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jan 20, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026 · 770 weekly returnsURTH returned more: +421.6% to +372.8%. ACWI swung slightly less: 15.3% to 15.6%. ACWI and URTH fell about the same at their worst: −32.1% and −32.7%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | ACWI | URTH | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +372.8% | +421.6% | URTH | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +11.1% | +11.8% | URTH (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +254.0% | +296.2% | URTH | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 15.3% | 15.6% | ACWI (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 10.7% | 10.9% | ACWI (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −32.1% | −32.7% | Tie | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.65 | 0.68 | URTH (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.93 | 0.97 | URTH (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.34 | 0.36 | URTH (slight) | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 770 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and URTH hold 88% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
88% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
ACWI and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI and URTH are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. ACWI follows MSCI ACWI and URTH follows MSCI World Index.
- Size. ACWI has $33.0bn in net assets and URTH $8.9bn (Net assets); ACWI is 3.7 times larger.
- Holdings in common (similar). 88% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
ACWI
ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,197 positions, with the top ten at 24.9%.
URTH
URTH tracks the MSCI World. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 69% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,254 positions, with the top ten at 27.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or URTH?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +13.4% and URTH +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, ACWI or URTH?
- URTH is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACWI against URTH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-urth
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). ACWI against URTH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-urth
[ACWI against URTH (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-urth)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.