Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
ACWI vs URTH: how they differ
ACWI and URTH hold 87% of their weight in the same names, and ACWI returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and iShares MSCI World ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and URTH hold 87% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ACWI | URTH |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA | 4.89% | 5.52% |
| APPLE | 4.67% | 5.28% |
| MICROSOFT | 3.38% | 3.82% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 2.38% | 2.67% |
| ALPHABET CLASS A | 1.90% | 2.14% |
| BROADCOM INC | 1.59% | 1.79% |
| ALPHABET CLASS C | 1.50% | 1.70% |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A | 1.38% | 1.56% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY | 1.08% | 1.21% |
| TESLA INC | 1.02% | 1.15% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO | 0.92% | 1.04% |
| ELI LILLY | 0.88% | 0.99% |
| Only in ACWI | Only in URTH |
|---|---|
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 1.86% | USD CASH 0.05% |
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 0.91% | ACCIONA 0.01% |
| SK HYNIX 0.74% | AMUNDI SA 0.01% |
| TENCENT HOLDINGS 0.32% | BARRY CALLEBAUT AG 0.01% |
| ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 0.22% | BC VAUD N 0.01% |
| MEDIATEK 0.21% | CHEUNG KONG INFRASTRUCTURE HOLDING 0.01% |
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 0.12% | CONTACT ENERGY LTD 0.01% |
| CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 0.10% | DEMANT 0.01% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | MSCI ACWI | MSCI World |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.1% | +17.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.6 pts | −0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.24% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 61.4% | 70.3% |
| Holdings | 1630 | 1230 |
ACWI in plain words
ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1630 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.
URTH in plain words
URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1230 positions, with the top ten at 26.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or URTH?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and URTH returned +17.4%, so ACWI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, ACWI or URTH?
- ACWI charges 0.32% a year and URTH charges 0.24%, so URTH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do ACWI and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 70% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 87% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against URTH, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-urth Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources