JGLO vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees

JGLO and URTH hold 34% of their weight in the same names, and URTH returned +16.2% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $6.4bn for JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF and $8.3bn for iShares MSCI World ETF.

URTH costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.1 points; URTH is 1.3 times larger.

JGLOURTH
Expense ratio0.47%0.24%
Net assets$6.4bn$8.3bn
Total return, 1 year+9.1%+16.2%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI World Index
Holdings in common34%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund41.3%28.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+9.1%
JGLO total return, 1 year
+16.2%
URTH total return, 1 year
0.47%
JGLO expense ratio
0.24%
URTH expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, JGLO and URTH hold 34% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

half

34% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding JGLO URTH
NVIDIA CORP COMMON STOCK 7.99% 5.75%
MICROSOFT CORP COMMON 6.46% 4.12%
APPLE INC COMMON STOCK 3.86% 5.39%
AMAZON.COM INC COMMON 5.36% 2.77%
ALPHABET INC-CL A 4.29% 2.25%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.30% 1.72%
BROADCOM INC COMMON 1.16% 1.78%
ASML HOLDING NV COMMON 2.83% 0.76%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34% 0.68%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 0.57% 1.27%
ABBVIE INC COMMON STOCK 1.53% 0.53%
MASTERCARD INC COMMON 3.43% 0.52%
Only in JGLO
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LTD 1.32%
HONG KONG EXCHANGES & 1.04%
SUMITOMO ELECTRIC 0.83%
NOVO NORDISK A/S COMMON 0.80%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR 0.79%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO 0.78%
MUENCHENER 0.69%
YUM CHINA HOLDINGS INC 0.43%
Only in URTH
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.77%
ELI LILLY 1.03%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 0.96%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 0.79%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 0.76%
VISA CLASS A 0.70%
WALMART 0.53%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 0.51%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

JGLO
JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the MSCI World
Total return, 1 year +9.1% +16.2%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −8.1 pts −1.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.47% 0.24%
Already in the S&P 500 70.1% 70.0%
Holdings 82 1255
Net assets $6.4bn $8.3bn

JGLO and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

JGLO in plain words

JGLO is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +9.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 82 positions, with the top ten at 41.3%.

URTH in plain words

URTH tracks the MSCI World. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,255 positions, with the top ten at 28.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, JGLO or URTH?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JGLO returned +9.1% and URTH +16.2%.
Which is cheaper, JGLO or URTH?
URTH is cheaper, by 0.23 percentage points a year. That is about $23 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do JGLO and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 70% of JGLO and 70% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, JGLO against URTH, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jglo-vs-urth

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.