ACWV vs JGLO: Differences, Returns & Fees

ACWV and JGLO hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and JGLO returned +9.1% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $3.3bn for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF and $6.4bn for JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF.

ACWV costs 0.27 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.3 points; JGLO is 1.9 times larger.

ACWVJGLO
Expense ratio0.20%0.47%
Net assets$3.3bn$6.4bn
Total return, 1 year+6.8%+9.1%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common12%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund12.2%41.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+6.8%
ACWV total return, 1 year
+9.1%
JGLO total return, 1 year
0.20%
ACWV expense ratio
0.47%
JGLO expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWV and JGLO hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

12% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ACWV JGLO
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.42% 2.34%
MICROSOFT 1.38% 6.46%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 1.30% 1.32%
NVIDIA 1.05% 7.99%
MCDONALDS CORP 0.76% 0.78%
CME GROUP CLASS A 0.57% 1.09%
ABBVIE 0.51% 1.53%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 0.50% 1.21%
AMPHENOL CORP CLASS A 0.49% 0.59%
APPLE 0.48% 3.86%
ASML HOLDING 0.46% 2.83%
KEYENCE 0.44% 0.52%
Only in ACWV
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.46%
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC 1.26%
DUKE ENERGY CORP 1.14%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.09%
KDDI 1.05%
CENCORA 1.02%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.00%
SOUTHERN 1.00%
Only in JGLO
AMAZON.COM INC COMMON 5.36%
ALPHABET INC-CL A 4.29%
SAFRAN SA COMMON STOCK 2.41%
NEXTERA ENERGY INC 2.31%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.30%
SHELL PLC 1.45%
BAKER HUGHES CO COMMON 1.35%
3M CO COMMON STOCK USD 1.32%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
JGLO
JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +6.8% +9.1%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −10.5 pts −8.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.47%
Already in the S&P 500 54.8% 70.1%
Holdings 382 82
Net assets $3.3bn $6.4bn

ACWV and JGLO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACWV in plain words

ACWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 382 positions, with the top ten at 12.2%.

JGLO in plain words

JGLO is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +9.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 82 positions, with the top ten at 41.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWV or JGLO?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWV returned +6.8% and JGLO +9.1%.
Which is cheaper, ACWV or JGLO?
ACWV is cheaper, by 0.27 percentage points a year. That is about $27 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWV and JGLO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 55% of ACWV and 70% of JGLO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACWV against JGLO, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwv-vs-jglo

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.