ACWV vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees

ACWV and URTH hold 25% of their weight in the same names, and URTH returned +16.2% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $3.3bn for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF and $8.3bn for iShares MSCI World ETF.

ACWV costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.4 points; URTH is 2.5 times larger.

ACWVURTH
Expense ratio0.20%0.24%
Net assets$3.3bn$8.3bn
Total return, 1 year+6.8%+16.2%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQMSCI World Index
Holdings in common25%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund12.2%28.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+6.8%
ACWV total return, 1 year
+16.2%
URTH total return, 1 year
0.20%
ACWV expense ratio
0.24%
URTH expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWV and URTH hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

25% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ACWV URTH
MICROSOFT 1.38% 4.12%
NVIDIA 1.05% 5.75%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.09% 0.79%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.00% 0.76%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.42% 0.68%
VISA CLASS A 0.63% 0.70%
WALMART 0.57% 0.53%
ABBVIE 0.51% 0.53%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.46% 0.51%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 0.50% 0.50%
APPLE 0.48% 5.39%
ASML HOLDING 0.46% 0.76%
Only in ACWV
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 1.30%
BANK OF CHINA LTD H 0.83%
BHARTI AIRTEL LTD 0.58%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 0.43%
BEONE MEDICINES AG 0.39%
E.SUN FINANCIAL HOLDING 0.39%
SAUDI ARABIAN OIL 0.36%
SAUDI TELECOM 0.35%
Only in URTH
AMAZON.COM INC 2.77%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.25%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.72%
TESLA INC 1.19%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 0.96%
INTEL CORPORATION 0.50%
LAM RESEARCH 0.43%
CATERPILLAR INC 0.40%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks the MSCI World
Total return, 1 year +6.8% +16.2%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −10.5 pts −1.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.24%
Already in the S&P 500 54.8% 70.0%
Holdings 382 1255
Net assets $3.3bn $8.3bn

ACWV and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACWV in plain words

ACWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 382 positions, with the top ten at 12.2%.

URTH in plain words

URTH tracks the MSCI World. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,255 positions, with the top ten at 28.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWV or URTH?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWV returned +6.8% and URTH +16.2%.
Which is cheaper, ACWV or URTH?
ACWV is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWV and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 55% of ACWV and 70% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACWV against URTH, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwv-vs-urth

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.