Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
CGGE vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, CGGE returned +11.7% to URTH's +15.2%; 32% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGGE and URTH
Net assets: $3.3bn on Nov 3, 2026 for Capital Group Global Equity ETF, and $9.4bn on Nov 4, 2026 for iShares MSCI World ETF.
Pair scorecard
URTH costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.5 points; URTH is 2.8 times larger.
| Measure | CGGE | URTH |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +11.7% | +15.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.3%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | MSCI World Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.24% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $3.3bn | $9.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 32% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 31.9% | 26.5% |
Risk and return
Jul 5, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026 · 121 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: CGGE against URTH, Jul 5, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026; URTH against ACWI, Jan 20, 2012 to Oct 30, 2026.
From Jul 2024 to Oct 2026, URTH returned more: +40.0% to +34.4%. CGGE and URTH swung about the same: 14.2% and 14.3%. CGGE fell less at its worst: −12.2% to −14.9%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | CGGE | URTH | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +34.4% | +40.0% | URTH | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +13.6% | +15.6% | URTH | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +33.4% | +36.0% | URTH (slight) | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 14.2% | 14.3% | Tie | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 9.7% | 9.5% | Tie | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −12.2% | −14.9% | CGGE | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 90.6% | 96.3% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 97.2% | 96.5% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 0.95 | 0.98 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.92 | 0.92 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.68 | 0.79 | URTH | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.99 | 1.19 | URTH | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.101 | 0.109 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 1.11 | 1.05 | CGGE (slight) | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | URTH | ACWI | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −1.2% a year | +0.9% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −0.45 | 0.80 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −6.4% to +4.1% | −1.4% to +3.2% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | −0.43 | 0.16 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 4.1% | 4.5% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 121 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGGE and URTH hold 32% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.
half
32% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGGE and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGGE
CGGE is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +11.7% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the MSCI World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 51% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 116 positions, with the top ten at 31.9%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Nov 4, 2026.
URTH
URTH tracks the MSCI World. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026, 69% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,254 positions, with the top ten at 26.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGE or URTH?
- In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGE returned +11.7% and URTH +15.2%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGE or URTH?
- URTH is cheaper, by 0.23 percentage points a year. That is about $23 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGE against URTH, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgge-vs-urth
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). CGGE against URTH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgge-vs-urth
[CGGE against URTH (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgge-vs-urth)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.