Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
CGGE vs JGLO: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, CGGE returned +11.7% to JGLO's +8.4%; 29% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGGE and JGLO
Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $3.3bn for Capital Group Global Equity ETF and $6.2bn for JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF.
Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.47% a year; their one-year returns differ by 3.3 points; JGLO is 1.9 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | CGGE | JGLO |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +11.7% | +8.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.3%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.47% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $3.3bn | $6.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 29% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 31.9% | 38.8% |
Risk and return
Jul 5, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026 · 121 weekly returns · each against URTHFrom Jul 2024 to Oct 2026, CGGE returned more: +34.4% to +18.9%. CGGE and JGLO swung about the same: 14.2% and 14.0%. CGGE fell less at its worst: −12.2% to −14.0%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | CGGE | JGLO | URTH | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | |||||
| Total return | +34.4% | +18.9% | CGGE | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. | |
| Annualized | +13.6% | +7.7% | CGGE | Total return as a yearly rate. | |
| Price return | +33.4% | +15.2% | CGGE | Price change alone, distributions left out. | |
| Risk | |||||
| Volatility | 14.2% | 14.0% | Tie | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. | |
| Downside deviation | 9.7% | 9.8% | Tie | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. | |
| Max drawdown | −12.2% | −14.0% | CGGE | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. | |
| Upside capture | 90.6% | 84.2% | 100.0% | CGGE (slight) | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. |
| Downside capture | 97.2% | 104.0% | 100.0% | CGGE (slight) | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. |
| Beta | 0.95 | 0.95 | 1.00 | Tie | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.92 | 0.94 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | |||||
| Sharpe | 0.68 | 0.30 | CGGE | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. | |
| Sortino | 0.99 | 0.43 | CGGE | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. | |
| Treynor | 0.101 | 0.045 | 0.113 | CGGE | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. |
| Calmar | 1.11 | 0.55 | CGGE | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. | |
| Against the benchmark | |||||
| Benchmark | URTH | URTH | URTH | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −1.2% a year | −6.5% a year | 0.0% | JGLO significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −0.45 | −2.98 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. | |
| Alpha range | −6.4% to +4.1% | −10.8% to −2.2% | CGGE's includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. | |
| Information ratio | −0.43 | −2.10 | CGGE | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 4.1% | 3.4% | 0.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 121 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGGE and JGLO hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.
half
29% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGGE and JGLO on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGGE
CGGE is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +11.7% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the MSCI World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 51% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 116 positions, with the top ten at 31.9%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Nov 4, 2026.
JGLO
JGLO is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +8.4% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the MSCI World Index. By its holdings published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 81 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGE against JGLO, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgge-vs-jglo
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). CGGE against JGLO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgge-vs-jglo
[CGGE against JGLO (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgge-vs-jglo)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.