JGLO vs KLMT: Differences, Returns & Fees
JGLO and KLMT hold 36% of their weight in the same names, and KLMT returned +17.5% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $6.4bn for JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF and $1.6bn for Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF.
KLMT costs 0.37 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.4 points; JGLO is 4.0 times larger.
| JGLO | KLMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.10% |
| Net assets | $6.4bn | $1.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +9.1% | +17.5% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | 36% | |
| Holdings dated | Oct 9, 2026 | Oct 10, 2026 |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 41.3% | 25.9% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JGLO and KLMT hold 36% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
half
36% in common
On the same fields
JGLO and KLMT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
JGLO in plain words
JGLO is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +9.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 82 positions, with the top ten at 41.3%.
KLMT in plain words
KLMT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 63% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 502 positions, with the top ten at 25.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, JGLO or KLMT?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JGLO returned +9.1% and KLMT +17.5%.
- Which is cheaper, JGLO or KLMT?
- KLMT is cheaper, by 0.37 percentage points a year. That is about $37 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, JGLO against KLMT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jglo-vs-klmt
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). JGLO against KLMT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jglo-vs-klmt
[JGLO against KLMT (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jglo-vs-klmt)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.