KLMT vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees

KLMT and URTH hold 77% of their weight in the same names, and KLMT returned +17.5% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $1.6bn for Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF and $8.3bn for iShares MSCI World ETF.

KLMT costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.3 points; URTH is 5.2 times larger.

KLMTURTH
Expense ratio0.10%0.24%
Net assets$1.6bn$8.3bn
Total return, 1 year+17.5%+16.2%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQMSCI World Index
Holdings in common77%
Holdings datedOct 10, 2026Oct 9, 2026
Top ten holdings, share of the fund25.9%28.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+17.5%
KLMT total return, 1 year
+16.2%
URTH total return, 1 year
0.10%
KLMT expense ratio
0.24%
URTH expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, KLMT and URTH hold 77% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

half

77% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding KLMT URTH
NVIDIA Corp 5.16% 5.75%
Apple Inc 4.82% 5.39%
Microsoft Corp 3.69% 4.12%
Amazon.com Inc 2.47% 2.77%
Alphabet Inc 2.21% 2.25%
Broadcom Inc 1.58% 1.78%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.55% 1.72%
Alphabet Inc 1.35% 1.77%
Micron Technology Inc 1.15% 1.27%
Tesla Inc 1.05% 1.19%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 0.99% 1.08%
Eli Lilly & Co 0.93% 1.03%
Only in KLMT
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 1.93%
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 1.00%
SK hynix Inc 0.71%
Tencent Holdings Ltd 0.42%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 0.26%
MediaTek Inc 0.25%
Delta Electronics Inc 0.17%
Itau Unibanco Holding SA 0.16%
Only in URTH
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 0.79%
SANDISK 0.25%
MARATHON PETROLEUM 0.15%
VALERO ENERGY CORP 0.14%
LAIR LIQUIDE SOCIETE ANONYME POUR 0.13%
NOVO NORDISK CLASS B 0.13%
PHILLIPS 66 0.12%
CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES LTD 0.11%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

KLMT
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks the MSCI World
Total return, 1 year +17.5% +16.2%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +0.2 pts −1.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.10% 0.24%
Already in the S&P 500 63.2% 70.0%
Holdings 502 1255
Net assets $1.6bn $8.3bn

KLMT and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

KLMT in plain words

KLMT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 63% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 502 positions, with the top ten at 25.9%.

URTH in plain words

URTH tracks the MSCI World. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,255 positions, with the top ten at 28.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, KLMT or URTH?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, KLMT returned +17.5% and URTH +16.2%.
Which is cheaper, KLMT or URTH?
KLMT is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do KLMT and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 63% of KLMT and 70% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, KLMT against URTH, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/klmt-vs-urth

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.