KLMT vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees
KLMT and URTH hold 77% of their weight in the same names, and KLMT returned +17.5% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $1.6bn for Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF and $8.3bn for iShares MSCI World ETF.
KLMT costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.3 points; URTH is 5.2 times larger.
| KLMT | URTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.10% | 0.24% |
| Net assets | $1.6bn | $8.3bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.5% | +16.2% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | MSCI World Index |
| Holdings in common | 77% | |
| Holdings dated | Oct 10, 2026 | Oct 9, 2026 |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 25.9% | 28.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KLMT and URTH hold 77% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
half
77% in common
On the same fields
KLMT and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
KLMT in plain words
KLMT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 63% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 502 positions, with the top ten at 25.9%.
URTH in plain words
URTH tracks the MSCI World. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,255 positions, with the top ten at 28.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, KLMT or URTH?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, KLMT returned +17.5% and URTH +16.2%.
- Which is cheaper, KLMT or URTH?
- KLMT is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, KLMT against URTH, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/klmt-vs-urth
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). KLMT against URTH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/klmt-vs-urth
[KLMT against URTH (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/klmt-vs-urth)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.