KLMT vs SPGM: Differences, Returns & Fees
KLMT and SPGM hold 68% of their weight in the same names, and SPGM returned +18.2% over the year. Net assets: $1.6bn on Oct 9, 2026 for Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF, and $1.8bn on Oct 8, 2026 for State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF.
SPGM costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.7 points.
| KLMT | SPGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.10% | 0.09% |
| Net assets, KLMT as of Oct 9, 2026 and SPGM as of Oct 8, 2026 | $1.6bn | $1.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.5% | +18.2% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | 68% | |
| Holdings dated | Oct 10, 2026 | Oct 8, 2026 |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 25.9% | 22.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KLMT and SPGM hold 68% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
68% in common
On the same fields
KLMT and SPGM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
KLMT in plain words
KLMT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 63% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 502 positions, with the top ten at 25.9%.
SPGM in plain words
SPGM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 58% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,895 positions, with the top ten at 22.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, KLMT or SPGM?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, KLMT returned +17.5% and SPGM +18.2%.
- Which is cheaper, KLMT or SPGM?
- SPGM is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, KLMT against SPGM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/klmt-vs-spgm
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). KLMT against SPGM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/klmt-vs-spgm
[KLMT against SPGM (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/klmt-vs-spgm)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.