A
vs
B
Share
Ask IQ about these two funds

CRBN vs KLMT: Differences, Returns & Fees

CRBN and KLMT hold 74% of their weight in the same names, and KLMT returned +17.5% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $1.2bn for iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF and $1.6bn for Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF.

KLMT costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.8 points; KLMT is 1.3 times larger.

CRBNKLMT
Expense ratio0.20%0.10%
Net assets$1.2bn$1.6bn
Total return, 1 year+15.7%+17.5%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common74%
Holdings datedOct 8, 2026Oct 10, 2026
Top ten holdings, share of the fund25.9%25.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+15.7%
CRBN total return, 1 year
+17.5%
KLMT total return, 1 year
0.20%
CRBN expense ratio
0.10%
KLMT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CRBN and KLMT hold 74% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

74% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CRBN KLMT
NVIDIA 5.18% 5.16%
APPLE 4.92% 4.82%
MICROSOFT 3.61% 3.69%
AMAZON.COM INC 2.42% 2.47%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.10% 2.21%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 1.94% 1.93%
BROADCOM INC 1.59% 1.58%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.54% 1.55%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.45% 1.35%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.17% 1.15%
TESLA INC 1.08% 1.05%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.00% 0.99%
Only in CRBN
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 0.59%
HALLIBURTON 0.28%
KINDER MORGAN 0.26%
PEMBINA PIPELINE 0.23%
TEXAS PACIFIC LAND 0.21%
INVESTOR CLASS B 0.18%
JAPAN POST HOLDINGS LTD 0.18%
AMERICAN WATER WORKS 0.17%
Only in KLMT
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 0.71%
Chevron Corp 0.41%
BHP Group Ltd 0.30%
GE Vernova Inc 0.28%
RTX Corp 0.27%
Toyota Motor Corp 0.23%
Shell PLC 0.21%
ConocoPhillips 0.21%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

CRBN
iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF
KLMT
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer iShares Invesco
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +15.7% +17.5%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −1.6 pts +0.2 pts
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.10%
Already in the S&P 500 60.8% 63.2%
Holdings 1059 502
Net assets $1.2bn $1.6bn

CRBN and KLMT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CRBN in plain words

CRBN tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,059 positions, with the top ten at 25.9%.

KLMT in plain words

KLMT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 63% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 502 positions, with the top ten at 25.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CRBN or KLMT?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CRBN returned +15.7% and KLMT +17.5%.
Which is cheaper, CRBN or KLMT?
KLMT is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CRBN and KLMT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of CRBN and 63% of KLMT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
CRBN vs DFAWCRBN vs JGLOCRBN vs VTCRBN vs SPGMDFAW vs KLMTKLMT vs SPGMJGLO vs KLMTKLMT vs URTH
CRBN on its own →KLMT on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
CRBN filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CRBN prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for CRBN ↗KLMT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗KLMT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Invesco page for KLMT ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CRBN against KLMT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/crbn-vs-klmt

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.