ACWI vs CRBN: Differences, Returns & Fees
ACWI and CRBN hold 77% of their weight in the same names, and ACWI returned +17.2% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $33.3bn for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and $1.2bn for iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF.
CRBN costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.5 points; ACWI is far larger, $33.3bn against $1.2bn.
| ACWI | CRBN | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.20% |
| Net assets | $33.3bn | $1.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +15.7% |
| What it tracks | MSCI ACWI | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | 77% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 25.6% | 25.9% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and CRBN hold 77% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
half
77% in common
On the same fields
ACWI and CRBN on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI in plain words
ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,199 positions, with the top ten at 25.6%.
CRBN in plain words
CRBN tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,059 positions, with the top ten at 25.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or CRBN?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +17.2% and CRBN +15.7%.
- Which is cheaper, ACWI or CRBN?
- CRBN is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACWI against CRBN, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-crbn
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). ACWI against CRBN. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-crbn
[ACWI against CRBN (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-crbn)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.