Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
ACWI vs EEM: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ACWI returned +13.4% to EEM's +16.3%; 10% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ACWI and EEMNet assets: $33.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF, and $29.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF.
Pair scorecard
ACWI costs 0.40 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.9 points; ACWI is 1.1 times larger.
| Measure | ACWI | EEM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.4% | +16.3% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 10.8%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI ACWI | MSCI Emerging Markets Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.72% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $32.6bn | $28.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 10% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 24.9% | 37.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Apr 4, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026 · 968 weekly returnsACWI returned more: +333.1% to +94.8%. ACWI swung less: 18.5% to 23.4%. ACWI fell slightly less at its worst: −55.3% to −61.2%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | ACWI | EEM | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +333.1% | +94.8% | ACWI | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +8.2% | +3.6% | ACWI | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +204.7% | +32.2% | ACWI | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 18.5% | 23.4% | ACWI | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 13.2% | 16.4% | ACWI | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −55.3% | −61.2% | ACWI (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.44 | 0.21 | ACWI | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.62 | 0.30 | ACWI | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.15 | 0.06 | ACWI | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 968 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and EEM hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
10% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
ACWI and EEM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI and EEM do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. ACWI follows MSCI ACWI and EEM follows MSCI Emerging Markets Index.
- Holdings in common. 10% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 ACWI returned +13.4% and EEM +16.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.9 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
ACWI
ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,197 positions, with the top ten at 24.9%.
EEM
EEM tracks an index of Emerging markets. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,186 positions, with the top ten at 37.2%. It sat 10.8% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or EEM?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +13.4% and EEM +16.3%.
- Which is cheaper, ACWI or EEM?
- ACWI is cheaper, by 0.40 percentage points a year. That is about $40 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACWI against EEM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-eem
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). ACWI against EEM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-eem
[ACWI against EEM (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-eem)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.