CRBN vs JGLO: Differences, Returns & Fees

CRBN and JGLO hold 34% of their weight in the same names, and CRBN returned +15.7% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $1.2bn for iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF and $6.4bn for JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF.

CRBN costs 0.27 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.6 points; JGLO is 5.3 times larger.

CRBNJGLO
Expense ratio0.20%0.47%
Net assets$1.2bn$6.4bn
Total return, 1 year+15.7%+9.1%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common34%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund25.9%41.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+15.7%
CRBN total return, 1 year
+9.1%
JGLO total return, 1 year
0.20%
CRBN expense ratio
0.47%
JGLO expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CRBN and JGLO hold 34% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

34% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CRBN JGLO
NVIDIA 5.18% 7.99%
APPLE 4.92% 3.86%
MICROSOFT 3.61% 6.46%
AMAZON.COM INC 2.42% 5.36%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.10% 4.29%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.54% 2.30%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 1.94% 1.32%
BROADCOM INC 1.59% 1.16%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 0.89% 0.78%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.76% 2.34%
ASML HOLDING 0.73% 2.83%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.17% 0.57%
Only in CRBN
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.45%
ELI LILLY 0.91%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 0.91%
SK HYNIX 0.71%
VISA CLASS A 0.66%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 0.59%
WALMART 0.50%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 0.49%
Only in JGLO
SAFRAN SA COMMON STOCK 2.41%
SHELL PLC 1.45%
CONOCOPHILLIPS COMMON 1.17%
HONG KONG EXCHANGES & 1.04%
SUMITOMO ELECTRIC 0.83%
NOVO NORDISK A/S COMMON 0.80%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR 0.79%
BURLINGTON STORES INC 0.73%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

CRBN
iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF
JGLO
JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +15.7% +9.1%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −1.6 pts −8.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.47%
Already in the S&P 500 60.8% 70.1%
Holdings 1059 82
Net assets $1.2bn $6.4bn

CRBN and JGLO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CRBN in plain words

CRBN tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,059 positions, with the top ten at 25.9%.

JGLO in plain words

JGLO is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +9.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 82 positions, with the top ten at 41.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CRBN or JGLO?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CRBN returned +15.7% and JGLO +9.1%.
Which is cheaper, CRBN or JGLO?
CRBN is cheaper, by 0.27 percentage points a year. That is about $27 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CRBN and JGLO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of CRBN and 70% of JGLO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CRBN against JGLO, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/crbn-vs-jglo

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.