CRBN vs JGLO: Differences, Returns & Fees
CRBN and JGLO hold 34% of their weight in the same names, and CRBN returned +15.7% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $1.2bn for iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF and $6.4bn for JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF.
CRBN costs 0.27 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.6 points; JGLO is 5.3 times larger.
| CRBN | JGLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | 0.47% |
| Net assets | $1.2bn | $6.4bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.7% | +9.1% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 34% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 25.9% | 41.3% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CRBN and JGLO hold 34% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
34% in common
On the same fields
CRBN and JGLO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CRBN in plain words
CRBN tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,059 positions, with the top ten at 25.9%.
JGLO in plain words
JGLO is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +9.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 82 positions, with the top ten at 41.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CRBN or JGLO?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CRBN returned +15.7% and JGLO +9.1%.
- Which is cheaper, CRBN or JGLO?
- CRBN is cheaper, by 0.27 percentage points a year. That is about $27 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CRBN against JGLO, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/crbn-vs-jglo
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CRBN against JGLO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/crbn-vs-jglo
[CRBN against JGLO (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/crbn-vs-jglo)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.