DFAW vs JGLO: Differences, Returns & Fees

DFAW and JGLO hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and DFAW returned +19.2% over the year. Net assets: $1.6bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional World Equity ETF, and $6.4bn on Oct 9, 2026 for JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF.

DFAW costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.1 points.

DFAWJGLO
Expense ratio0.24%0.47%
Net assets, DFAW as of Jul 31, 2026 and JGLO as of Oct 9, 2026$1.6bn$6.4bn
Total return, 1 year+19.2%+9.1%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund99.9%41.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+19.2%
DFAW total return, 1 year
+9.1%
JGLO total return, 1 year
0.24%
DFAW expense ratio
0.47%
JGLO expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DFAW and JGLO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding DFAW JGLO
Only in DFAW
Dimensional U S Core Equity 2 ETF 53.37%
DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF 18.65%
Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF 17.70%
DFA Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF 8.48%
DFA Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF 1.73%
Only in JGLO
NVIDIA CORP COMMON STOCK 7.99%
MICROSOFT CORP COMMON 6.46%
AMAZON.COM INC COMMON 5.36%
ALPHABET INC-CL A 4.29%
APPLE INC COMMON STOCK 3.86%
MASTERCARD INC COMMON 3.43%
ASML HOLDING NV COMMON 2.83%
SAFRAN SA COMMON STOCK 2.41%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

DFAW
Dimensional World Equity ETF
JGLO
JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +19.2% +9.1%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +1.9 pts −8.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.24% 0.47%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 70.1%
Holdings 5 82
Net assets, DFAW as of Jul 31, 2026 and JGLO as of Oct 9, 2026 $1.6bn $6.4bn

DFAW and JGLO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

DFAW in plain words

DFAW is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 5 positions, with the top ten at 99.9%.

JGLO in plain words

JGLO is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +9.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 82 positions, with the top ten at 41.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFAW or JGLO?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFAW returned +19.2% and JGLO +9.1%.
Which is cheaper, DFAW or JGLO?
DFAW is cheaper, by 0.23 percentage points a year. That is about $23 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFAW and JGLO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of DFAW and 70% of JGLO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DFAW against JGLO, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfaw-vs-jglo

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.