DFAW vs VT: Differences, Returns & Fees

DFAW and VT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and DFAW returned +19.2% over the year. Net assets: $1.6bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional World Equity ETF, and $81.8bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total World Stock Index ETF.

VT costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.1 points; VT is far larger, $97.9bn against $1.6bn.

DFAWVT
Expense ratio0.24%0.06%
Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026$1.6bn$97.9bn
Total return, 1 year+19.2%+17.1%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedFTSE Global All Cap Index
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund99.9%21.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

+19.2%
DFAW total return, 1 year
+17.1%
VT total return, 1 year
0.24%
DFAW expense ratio
0.06%
VT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DFAW and VT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding DFAW VT
Only in DFAW
Dimensional U S Core Equity 2 ETF 53.37%
DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF 18.65%
Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF 17.70%
DFA Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF 8.48%
DFA Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF 1.73%
Only in VT
NVIDIA Corp 4.32%
Apple Inc 3.84%
Microsoft Corp 3.16%
Amazon.com Inc 2.11%
Alphabet Inc 1.68%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 1.53%
Broadcom Inc 1.45%
Alphabet Inc 1.31%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

DFAW
Dimensional World Equity ETF
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Total World Stock
Total return, 1 year +19.2% +17.1%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +1.9 pts −0.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.24% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 54.7%
Holdings 5 10097
Net assets, DFAW as of Jul 31, 2026 and VT as of Sep 30, 2026 $1.6bn $81.8bn

DFAW and VT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

DFAW in plain words

DFAW is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 5 positions, with the top ten at 99.9%.

VT in plain words

VT tracks an index of Total World Stock. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Aug 31, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10,097 positions, with the top ten at 21.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFAW or VT?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFAW returned +19.2% and VT +17.1%.
Which is cheaper, DFAW or VT?
VT is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFAW and VT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of DFAW and 55% of VT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DFAW against VT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfaw-vs-vt

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.