ACWI vs DFAW: Differences, Returns & Fees
ACWI and DFAW hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and DFAW returned +19.2% over the year. Net assets: $33.3bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF, and $1.6bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional World Equity ETF.
DFAW costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.0 points; ACWI is far larger, $32.5bn against $1.6bn.
| ACWI | DFAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.24% |
| Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026 | $32.5bn | $1.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +19.2% |
| What it tracks | MSCI ACWI | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 25.6% | 99.9% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and DFAW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
half
0% in common
On the same fields
ACWI and DFAW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI in plain words
ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,199 positions, with the top ten at 25.6%.
DFAW in plain words
DFAW is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 5 positions, with the top ten at 99.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or DFAW?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +17.2% and DFAW +19.2%.
- Which is cheaper, ACWI or DFAW?
- DFAW is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACWI against DFAW, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-dfaw
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). ACWI against DFAW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-dfaw
[ACWI against DFAW (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-dfaw)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.