ACWI vs DFAW: Differences, Returns & Fees

ACWI and DFAW hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and DFAW returned +19.2% over the year. Net assets: $33.3bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF, and $1.6bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional World Equity ETF.

DFAW costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.0 points; ACWI is far larger, $32.5bn against $1.6bn.

ACWIDFAW
Expense ratio0.32%0.24%
Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026$32.5bn$1.6bn
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+19.2%
What it tracksMSCI ACWINo index, actively managed
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund25.6%99.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+17.2%
ACWI total return, 1 year
+19.2%
DFAW total return, 1 year
0.32%
ACWI expense ratio
0.24%
DFAW expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and DFAW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ACWI DFAW
Only in ACWI
NVIDIA 5.12%
APPLE 4.83%
MICROSOFT 3.56%
AMAZON.COM INC 2.38%
ALPHABET CLASS A 1.97%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 1.90%
BROADCOM INC 1.57%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.56%
Only in DFAW
Dimensional U S Core Equity 2 ETF 53.37%
DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF 18.65%
Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF 17.70%
DFA Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF 8.48%
DFA Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF 1.73%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
DFAW
Dimensional World Equity ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI ACWI Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +17.2% +19.2%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 0.0 pts +1.9 pts
Expense ratio 0.32% 0.24%
Already in the S&P 500 60.9% 0.0%
Holdings 2199 5
Net assets, ACWI as of Oct 9, 2026 and DFAW as of Jul 31, 2026 $33.3bn $1.6bn

ACWI and DFAW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACWI in plain words

ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,199 positions, with the top ten at 25.6%.

DFAW in plain words

DFAW is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 5 positions, with the top ten at 99.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or DFAW?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +17.2% and DFAW +19.2%.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or DFAW?
DFAW is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and DFAW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 0% of DFAW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACWI against DFAW, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-dfaw

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.