Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
ACWI vs VT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ACWI returned +13.4% to VT's +13.5%; 83% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ACWI and VT
Net assets: $33.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF, and $81.8bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total World Stock Index ETF.
Pair scorecard
VT costs 0.26 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; VT is 2.5 times larger.
| Measure | ACWI | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.4% | +13.5% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI ACWI | FTSE Global All Cap Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.06% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $32.8bn | $81.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 83% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 24.9% | 22.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jul 3, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026 · 955 weekly returnsVT returned slightly more: +371.6% to +363.7%. ACWI and VT swung about the same: 18.5% and 18.3%. ACWI and VT fell about the same at their worst: −49.1% and −48.3%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | ACWI | VT | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +363.7% | +371.6% | VT (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +8.7% | +8.8% | Tie | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +226.2% | +221.4% | ACWI (slight) | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 18.5% | 18.3% | Tie | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 13.3% | 13.1% | Tie | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −49.1% | −48.3% | Tie | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.47 | 0.48 | Tie | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.65 | 0.66 | Tie | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.18 | 0.18 | VT (slight) | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 955 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and VT hold 83% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
83% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
ACWI and VT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI and VT are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. ACWI follows MSCI ACWI and VT follows FTSE Global All Cap Index.
- Number of holdings. ACWI holds 2,197 positions and VT holds 10194.
- Cost. ACWI charges 0.32% of assets a year and VT 0.06%, a gap of 0.26 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
ACWI
ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,197 positions, with the top ten at 24.9%.
VT
VT tracks an index of Total World Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10,194 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or VT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +13.4% and VT +13.5%.
- Which is cheaper, ACWI or VT?
- VT is cheaper, by 0.26 percentage points a year. That is about $26 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACWI against VT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-vt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). ACWI against VT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-vt
[ACWI against VT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-vt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.