ACWI vs SPGM: Differences, Returns & Fees
ACWI and SPGM hold 71% of their weight in the same names, and SPGM returned +18.2% over the year. Net assets: $33.3bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF, and $1.8bn on Oct 8, 2026 for State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF.
SPGM costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.0 point; ACWI is 18.3 times larger.
| ACWI | SPGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.09% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $33.0bn | $1.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +18.2% |
| What it tracks | MSCI ACWI | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | 71% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 25.6% | 22.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and SPGM hold 71% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
half
71% in common
On the same fields
ACWI and SPGM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI in plain words
ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,199 positions, with the top ten at 25.6%.
SPGM in plain words
SPGM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 58% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,895 positions, with the top ten at 22.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or SPGM?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +17.2% and SPGM +18.2%.
- Which is cheaper, ACWI or SPGM?
- SPGM is cheaper, by 0.23 percentage points a year. That is about $23 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACWI against SPGM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-spgm
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). ACWI against SPGM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-spgm
[ACWI against SPGM (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-spgm)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.