ACWV vs SPGM: Differences, Returns & Fees

ACWV and SPGM hold 24% of their weight in the same names, and SPGM returned +18.2% over the year. Net assets: $3.3bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF, and $1.8bn on Oct 8, 2026 for State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF.

SPGM costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.4 points.

ACWVSPGM
Expense ratio0.20%0.09%
Net assets, ACWV as of Oct 9, 2026 and SPGM as of Oct 8, 2026$3.3bn$1.8bn
Total return, 1 year+6.8%+18.2%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common24%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund12.2%22.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

+6.8%
ACWV total return, 1 year
+18.2%
SPGM total return, 1 year
0.20%
ACWV expense ratio
0.09%
SPGM expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWV and SPGM hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

half

24% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ACWV SPGM
MICROSOFT 1.38% 3.19%
NVIDIA 1.05% 4.65%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.00% 0.71%
VISA CLASS A 0.63% 0.63%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.09% 0.59%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.42% 0.48%
APPLE 0.48% 4.29%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.46% 0.47%
ASML HOLDING 0.46% 0.64%
ABBVIE 0.51% 0.43%
CHEVRON 0.43% 0.47%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP 0.43% 0.44%
Only in ACWV
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 1.30%
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC 1.26%
CENCORA 1.02%
CONSOLIDATED EDISON 0.77%
KROGER 0.67%
WEC ENERGY GROUP 0.67%
NTT 0.64%
MONSTER BEVERAGE 0.60%
Only in SPGM
AMAZON.COM INC 2.02%
ALPHABET INC CL A 1.75%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR SP ADR 1.64%
META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A 1.36%
TESLA INC 0.91%
JPMORGAN CHASE + CO 0.88%
SAMSUNG ELECTR GDR REG S 0.80%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 0.44%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
SPGM
State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +6.8% +18.2%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −10.5 pts +0.9 pts
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.09%
Already in the S&P 500 54.8% 58.2%
Holdings 382 2895
Net assets, ACWV as of Oct 9, 2026 and SPGM as of Oct 8, 2026 $3.3bn $1.8bn

ACWV and SPGM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACWV in plain words

ACWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 382 positions, with the top ten at 12.2%.

SPGM in plain words

SPGM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 58% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,895 positions, with the top ten at 22.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWV or SPGM?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWV returned +6.8% and SPGM +18.2%.
Which is cheaper, ACWV or SPGM?
SPGM is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWV and SPGM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 55% of ACWV and 58% of SPGM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACWV against SPGM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwv-vs-spgm

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.