ACWV vs SPGM: Differences, Returns & Fees
ACWV and SPGM hold 24% of their weight in the same names, and SPGM returned +18.2% over the year. Net assets: $3.3bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF, and $1.8bn on Oct 8, 2026 for State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF.
SPGM costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.4 points.
| ACWV | SPGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | 0.09% |
| Net assets, ACWV as of Oct 9, 2026 and SPGM as of Oct 8, 2026 | $3.3bn | $1.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.8% | +18.2% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | 24% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 12.2% | 22.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACWV and SPGM hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
half
24% in common
On the same fields
ACWV and SPGM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWV in plain words
ACWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 382 positions, with the top ten at 12.2%.
SPGM in plain words
SPGM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 58% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,895 positions, with the top ten at 22.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWV or SPGM?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWV returned +6.8% and SPGM +18.2%.
- Which is cheaper, ACWV or SPGM?
- SPGM is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACWV against SPGM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwv-vs-spgm
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). ACWV against SPGM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwv-vs-spgm
[ACWV against SPGM (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwv-vs-spgm)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.