ACWV vs VT: Differences, Returns & Fees

ACWV and VT hold 24% of their weight in the same names, and VT returned +17.1% over the year. Net assets: $3.3bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF, and $81.8bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total World Stock Index ETF.

VT costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.3 points.

ACWVVT
Expense ratio0.20%0.06%
Net assets, ACWV as of Oct 9, 2026 and VT as of Sep 30, 2026$3.3bn$81.8bn
Total return, 1 year+6.8%+17.1%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQFTSE Global All Cap Index
Holdings in common24%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund12.2%21.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+6.8%
ACWV total return, 1 year
+17.1%
VT total return, 1 year
0.20%
ACWV expense ratio
0.06%
VT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWV and VT hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

24% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ACWV VT
MICROSOFT 1.38% 3.16%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 1.30% 1.53%
NVIDIA 1.05% 4.32%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.09% 0.69%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.00% 0.56%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.42% 0.54%
VISA CLASS A 0.63% 0.52%
APPLE 0.48% 3.84%
ASML HOLDING 0.46% 0.55%
WALMART 0.57% 0.39%
ABBVIE 0.51% 0.38%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.46% 0.37%
Only in ACWV
BANK OF CHINA LTD H 0.83%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 0.43%
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF 0.34%
AGRICULTURAL BANK OF CHINA LTD H 0.31%
ORIENTAL LAND 0.29%
PICC PROPERTY AND CASUALTY LTD H 0.27%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 0.27%
PETROCHINA H 0.26%
Only in VT
Amazon.com Inc 2.11%
Alphabet Inc 1.68%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.05%
Tesla Inc 0.90%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 0.80%
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 0.73%
MKTLIQ 0.60%
SLBBH1142 0.58%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index of Total World Stock
Total return, 1 year +6.8% +17.1%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −10.5 pts −0.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 54.8% 54.7%
Holdings 382 10097
Net assets, ACWV as of Oct 9, 2026 and VT as of Sep 30, 2026 $3.3bn $81.8bn

ACWV and VT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACWV in plain words

ACWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 382 positions, with the top ten at 12.2%.

VT in plain words

VT tracks an index of Total World Stock. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Aug 31, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10,097 positions, with the top ten at 21.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWV or VT?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWV returned +6.8% and VT +17.1%.
Which is cheaper, ACWV or VT?
VT is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWV and VT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 55% of ACWV and 55% of VT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACWV against VT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwv-vs-vt

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.