Which returned more over the last year, ACWV or KLMT?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWV returned +6.8% and KLMT +17.5%.

Which is cheaper, ACWV or KLMT?

KLMT is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do ACWV and KLMT overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 55% of ACWV and 63% of KLMT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Share on X Download as PDF

Ask IQ about these two funds

ACWV vs KLMT: Differences, Returns & Fees

ACWV and KLMT hold 27% of their weight in the same names, and KLMT returned +17.5% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $3.3bn for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF and $1.6bn for Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF.

KLMT costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.7 points; ACWV is 2.1 times larger.

	ACWV	KLMT
Expense ratio	0.20%	0.10%
Net assets	$3.3bn	$1.6bn
Total return, 1 year	+6.8%	+17.5%
What it tracks	not read by ETFIQ	not read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common	27%
Holdings dated	Oct 8, 2026	Oct 10, 2026
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	12.2%	25.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+6.8%

ACWV total return, 1 year

+17.5%

KLMT total return, 1 year

0.20%

ACWV expense ratio

0.10%

KLMT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWV and KLMT hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

50%

half

27% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding ACWV KLMT

MICROSOFT 1.38% 3.69%

TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 1.30% 1.93%

NVIDIA 1.05% 5.16%

EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.00% 0.71%

JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.42% 0.67%

VISA CLASS A 0.63% 0.68%

ABBVIE 0.51% 0.51%

CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.46% 0.50%

WALMART 0.57% 0.50%

APPLE 0.48% 4.82%

ASML HOLDING 0.46% 0.74%

PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 0.50% 0.45%

Only in ACWV

DUKE ENERGY CORP 1.14%

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.09%

SOUTHERN 1.00%

REPUBLIC SERVICES INC 0.85%

BANK OF CHINA LTD H 0.83%

KROGER 0.67%

WEC ENERGY GROUP 0.67%

NTT 0.64%

Only in KLMT

Amazon.com Inc 2.47%

Alphabet Inc 2.21%

Meta Platforms Inc 1.55%

Tesla Inc 1.05%

Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 1.00%

JPMorgan Chase & Co 0.89%

Intel Corp 0.46%

Lam Research Corp 0.44%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

ACWV

iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF

KLMT

Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF

Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF

Issuer iShares Invesco

What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index

Total return, 1 year +6.8% +17.5%

S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%

Gap to the S&P 500 −10.5 pts +0.2 pts

Expense ratio 0.20% 0.10%

Already in the S&P 500 54.8% 63.2%

Holdings 382 502

Net assets $3.3bn $1.6bn

ACWV and KLMT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACWV in plain words

ACWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 382 positions, with the top ten at 12.2%.

KLMT in plain words

KLMT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 63% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 502 positions, with the top ten at 25.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWV or KLMT?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWV returned +6.8% and KLMT +17.5%.
Which is cheaper, ACWV or KLMT?: KLMT is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWV and KLMT overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 55% of ACWV and 63% of KLMT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

ACWV vs DFAW ACWV vs SPGM ACWV vs CRBN ACWV vs JGLO KLMT vs SPGM DFAW vs KLMT KLMT vs URTH CRBN vs KLMT

ACWV on its own →KLMT on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

ACWV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ACWV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for ACWV ↗KLMT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗KLMT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Invesco page for KLMT ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACWV against KLMT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwv-vs-klmt

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.