ACWV vs CRBN: Differences, Returns & Fees

ACWV and CRBN hold 25% of their weight in the same names, and CRBN returned +15.7% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $3.3bn for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF and $1.2bn for iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF.

Both cost 0.20% a year; their one-year returns differ by 8.9 points; ACWV is 2.8 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ACWVCRBN
Expense ratio0.20%0.20%
Net assets$3.3bn$1.2bn
Total return, 1 year+6.8%+15.7%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common25%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund12.2%25.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

+6.8%
ACWV total return, 1 year
+15.7%
CRBN total return, 1 year
0.20%
ACWV expense ratio
0.20%
CRBN expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWV and CRBN hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

half

25% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ACWV CRBN
MICROSOFT 1.38% 3.61%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 1.30% 1.94%
NVIDIA 1.05% 5.18%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.42% 0.76%
VISA CLASS A 0.63% 0.66%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.09% 0.59%
ABBVIE 0.51% 0.51%
WALMART 0.57% 0.50%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.46% 0.49%
APPLE 0.48% 4.92%
ASML HOLDING 0.46% 0.73%
COCA-COLA 0.82% 0.44%
Only in ACWV
DUKE ENERGY CORP 1.14%
CENCORA 1.02%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.00%
SOUTHERN 1.00%
MCKESSON CORP 0.92%
REPUBLIC SERVICES INC 0.85%
BANK OF CHINA LTD H 0.83%
KROGER 0.67%
Only in CRBN
AMAZON.COM INC 2.42%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.10%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.54%
TESLA INC 1.08%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 0.91%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 0.89%
INTEL CORPORATION 0.47%
LAM RESEARCH 0.39%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
CRBN
iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +6.8% +15.7%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −10.5 pts −1.6 pts
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.20%
Already in the S&P 500 54.8% 60.8%
Holdings 382 1059
Net assets $3.3bn $1.2bn

ACWV and CRBN on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACWV in plain words

ACWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 382 positions, with the top ten at 12.2%.

CRBN in plain words

CRBN tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,059 positions, with the top ten at 25.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWV or CRBN?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWV returned +6.8% and CRBN +15.7%.
Which is cheaper, ACWV or CRBN?
Neither: ACWV and CRBN both charge 0.20% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWV and CRBN overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 55% of ACWV and 61% of CRBN by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACWV against CRBN, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwv-vs-crbn

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.