ACWV vs DFAW: Differences, Returns & Fees

ACWV and DFAW hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and DFAW returned +19.2% over the year. Net assets: $3.3bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF, and $1.6bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional World Equity ETF.

ACWV costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.4 points.

ACWVDFAW
Expense ratio0.20%0.24%
Net assets, ACWV as of Oct 9, 2026 and DFAW as of Jul 31, 2026$3.3bn$1.6bn
Total return, 1 year+6.8%+19.2%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund12.2%99.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+6.8%
ACWV total return, 1 year
+19.2%
DFAW total return, 1 year
0.20%
ACWV expense ratio
0.24%
DFAW expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWV and DFAW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ACWV DFAW
Only in ACWV
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.46%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.42%
MICROSOFT 1.38%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 1.30%
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC 1.26%
DUKE ENERGY CORP 1.14%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.09%
KDDI 1.05%
Only in DFAW
Dimensional U S Core Equity 2 ETF 53.37%
DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF 18.65%
Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF 17.70%
DFA Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF 8.48%
DFA Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF 1.73%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
DFAW
Dimensional World Equity ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +6.8% +19.2%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −10.5 pts +1.9 pts
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.24%
Already in the S&P 500 54.8% 0.0%
Holdings 382 5
Net assets, ACWV as of Oct 9, 2026 and DFAW as of Jul 31, 2026 $3.3bn $1.6bn

ACWV and DFAW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACWV in plain words

ACWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 382 positions, with the top ten at 12.2%.

DFAW in plain words

DFAW is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 5 positions, with the top ten at 99.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWV or DFAW?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWV returned +6.8% and DFAW +19.2%.
Which is cheaper, ACWV or DFAW?
ACWV is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWV and DFAW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 55% of ACWV and 0% of DFAW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACWV against DFAW, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwv-vs-dfaw

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.