ACWV vs DFAW: Differences, Returns & Fees
ACWV and DFAW hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and DFAW returned +19.2% over the year. Net assets: $3.3bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF, and $1.6bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional World Equity ETF.
ACWV costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.4 points.
| ACWV | DFAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | 0.24% |
| Net assets, ACWV as of Oct 9, 2026 and DFAW as of Jul 31, 2026 | $3.3bn | $1.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.8% | +19.2% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 12.2% | 99.9% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACWV and DFAW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
half
0% in common
On the same fields
ACWV and DFAW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWV in plain words
ACWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 382 positions, with the top ten at 12.2%.
DFAW in plain words
DFAW is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 5 positions, with the top ten at 99.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWV or DFAW?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWV returned +6.8% and DFAW +19.2%.
- Which is cheaper, ACWV or DFAW?
- ACWV is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACWV against DFAW, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwv-vs-dfaw
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). ACWV against DFAW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwv-vs-dfaw
[ACWV against DFAW (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwv-vs-dfaw)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.