DFAW vs KLMT: Differences, Returns & Fees
DFAW and KLMT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and DFAW returned +19.2% over the year. Net assets: $1.6bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional World Equity ETF, and $1.6bn on Oct 9, 2026 for Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF.
KLMT costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.7 points.
| DFAW | KLMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.24% | 0.10% |
| Net assets, DFAW as of Jul 31, 2026 and KLMT as of Oct 9, 2026 | $1.6bn | $1.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.2% | +17.5% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Holdings dated | Jul 31, 2026 | Oct 10, 2026 |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 99.9% | 25.9% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DFAW and KLMT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
0% in common
On the same fields
DFAW and KLMT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFAW in plain words
DFAW is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 5 positions, with the top ten at 99.9%.
KLMT in plain words
KLMT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 63% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 502 positions, with the top ten at 25.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DFAW or KLMT?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFAW returned +19.2% and KLMT +17.5%.
- Which is cheaper, DFAW or KLMT?
- KLMT is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DFAW against KLMT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfaw-vs-klmt
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). DFAW against KLMT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfaw-vs-klmt
[DFAW against KLMT (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfaw-vs-klmt)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.