DFAW vs KLMT: Differences, Returns & Fees

DFAW and KLMT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and DFAW returned +19.2% over the year. Net assets: $1.6bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional World Equity ETF, and $1.6bn on Oct 9, 2026 for Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF.

KLMT costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.7 points.

DFAWKLMT
Expense ratio0.24%0.10%
Net assets, DFAW as of Jul 31, 2026 and KLMT as of Oct 9, 2026$1.6bn$1.6bn
Total return, 1 year+19.2%+17.5%
What it tracksNo index, actively managednot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common0%
Holdings datedJul 31, 2026Oct 10, 2026
Top ten holdings, share of the fund99.9%25.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+19.2%
DFAW total return, 1 year
+17.5%
KLMT total return, 1 year
0.24%
DFAW expense ratio
0.10%
KLMT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DFAW and KLMT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding DFAW KLMT
Only in DFAW
Dimensional U S Core Equity 2 ETF 53.37%
DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF 18.65%
Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF 17.70%
DFA Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF 8.48%
DFA Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF 1.73%
Only in KLMT
NVIDIA Corp 5.16%
Apple Inc 4.82%
Microsoft Corp 3.69%
Amazon.com Inc 2.47%
Alphabet Inc 2.21%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 1.93%
Broadcom Inc 1.58%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.55%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

DFAW
Dimensional World Equity ETF
KLMT
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +19.2% +17.5%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +1.9 pts +0.2 pts
Expense ratio 0.24% 0.10%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 63.2%
Holdings 5 502
Net assets, DFAW as of Jul 31, 2026 and KLMT as of Oct 9, 2026 $1.6bn $1.6bn

DFAW and KLMT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

DFAW in plain words

DFAW is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 5 positions, with the top ten at 99.9%.

KLMT in plain words

KLMT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 63% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 502 positions, with the top ten at 25.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFAW or KLMT?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFAW returned +19.2% and KLMT +17.5%.
Which is cheaper, DFAW or KLMT?
KLMT is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFAW and KLMT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of DFAW and 63% of KLMT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DFAW against KLMT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfaw-vs-klmt

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.