Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or KLMT?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +17.2% and KLMT +17.5%.

Which is cheaper, ACWI or KLMT?

KLMT is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do ACWI and KLMT overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 63% of KLMT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Share on X Download as PDF

Ask IQ about these two funds

ACWI vs KLMT: Differences, Returns & Fees

ACWI and KLMT hold 76% of their weight in the same names. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $33.3bn for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and $1.6bn for Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF.

KLMT costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points; ACWI is far larger, $33.3bn against $1.6bn.

	ACWI	KLMT
Expense ratio	0.32%	0.10%
Net assets	$33.3bn	$1.6bn
Total return, 1 year	+17.2%	+17.5%
What it tracks	MSCI ACWI	not read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common	76%
Holdings dated	Oct 8, 2026	Oct 10, 2026
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	25.6%	25.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+17.2%

ACWI total return, 1 year

+17.5%

KLMT total return, 1 year

0.32%

ACWI expense ratio

0.10%

KLMT expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and KLMT hold 76% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

50%

half

76% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding ACWI KLMT

NVIDIA 5.12% 5.16%

APPLE 4.83% 4.82%

MICROSOFT 3.56% 3.69%

AMAZON.COM INC 2.38% 2.47%

ALPHABET CLASS A 1.97% 2.21%

TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 1.90% 1.93%

BROADCOM INC 1.57% 1.58%

META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.53% 1.55%

ALPHABET CLASS C 1.56% 1.35%

MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.13% 1.15%

TESLA INC 1.04% 1.05%

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 0.98% 0.99%

Only in ACWI

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 0.70%

SANDISK 0.23%

MARATHON PETROLEUM 0.13%

VALERO ENERGY CORP 0.13%

NOVO NORDISK CLASS B 0.12%

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 0.12%

LAIR LIQUIDE SOCIETE ANONYME POUR 0.11%

PHILLIPS 66 0.11%

Only in KLMT

Itau Unibanco Holding SA 0.16%

Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd 0.15%

Atlas Copco AB 0.14%

Itausa SA 0.14%

Novo Nordisk A/S 0.14%

Taiwan Cooperative Financial Holding Co Ltd 0.14%

Bank of China Ltd 0.12%

Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd 0.12%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

ACWI

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF

KLMT

Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF

Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF

Issuer iShares Invesco

What it is Tracks the MSCI ACWI Tracks an index

Total return, 1 year +17.2% +17.5%

S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%

Gap to the S&P 500 0.0 pts +0.2 pts

Expense ratio 0.32% 0.10%

Already in the S&P 500 60.9% 63.2%

Holdings 2199 502

Net assets $33.3bn $1.6bn

ACWI and KLMT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACWI in plain words

ACWI tracks the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,199 positions, with the top ten at 25.6%.

KLMT in plain words

KLMT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 63% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 502 positions, with the top ten at 25.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or KLMT?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +17.2% and KLMT +17.5%.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or KLMT?: KLMT is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and KLMT overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 63% of KLMT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

ACWI vs VT ACWI vs DFAW ACWI vs SPGM ACWI vs CRBN KLMT vs VT KLMT vs URTH ACWV vs KLMT KLMT vs SPGM

ACWI on its own →KLMT on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

ACWI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ACWI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for ACWI ↗KLMT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗KLMT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Invesco page for KLMT ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACWI against KLMT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwi-vs-klmt

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.