CRBN vs FEGE: Differences, Returns & Fees
CRBN and FEGE hold 11% of their weight in the same names, and FEGE returned +18.5% over the year. Net assets: $1.2bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF, and $1.9bn on May 31, 2026 for First Eagle Global Equity ETF.
CRBN costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.1 points.
| CRBN | FEGE | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | 0.50% |
| Net assets, CRBN as of Oct 20, 2026 and FEGE as of May 31, 2026 | $1.2bn | $1.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.4% | +18.5% |
| What it tracks | MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target Index | not published |
| Holdings in common | 11% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 25.6% | 23.3% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CRBN and FEGE hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
11% in common
On the same fields
CRBN and FEGE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CRBN
CRBN tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +15.1% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,046 positions, with the top ten at 25.6%.
About FEGE
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +18.5% with distributions reinvested, against +14.9% for its benchmark, the MSCI WORLD INDEX Net. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 45% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 94 positions, with the top ten at 23.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CRBN or FEGE?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CRBN returned +13.4% and FEGE +18.5%.
- Which is cheaper, CRBN or FEGE?
- CRBN is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CRBN against FEGE, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/crbn-vs-fege
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). CRBN against FEGE. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/crbn-vs-fege
[CRBN against FEGE (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/crbn-vs-fege)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.