Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IXUS vs URTH: how they differ

IXUS and URTH hold 27% of their weight in the same names, and IXUS returned more over the year.

iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF and iShares MSCI World ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IXUS and URTH hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IXUS and URTH both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIXUSURTH
ASML HOLDING1.55%0.73%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC0.84%0.39%
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA0.68%0.32%
SHELL PLC0.62%0.29%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP0.59%0.28%
NOVARTIS AG0.59%0.28%
ASTRAZENECA PLC0.56%0.27%
NESTLE SA0.58%0.27%
BHP GROUP LTD0.54%0.25%
SIEMENS N AG0.51%0.24%
TORONTO DOMINION0.47%0.22%
ALLIANZ0.45%0.21%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IXUSOnly in URTH
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 4.49%NVIDIA 5.52%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 2.21%APPLE 5.28%
SK HYNIX 1.79%MICROSOFT 3.82%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 0.78%AMAZON.COM INC 2.67%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 0.53%ALPHABET CLASS A 2.14%
MEDIATEK 0.51%BROADCOM INC 1.79%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 0.29%ALPHABET CLASS C 1.70%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 0.24%META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

IXUS and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore MSCI Total International StockMSCI World
Total return, 1 year+22.2%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.7 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.24%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%70.3%
Holdings25401230

IXUS in plain words

IXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2540 positions, with the top ten at 14.3%.

URTH in plain words

URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1230 positions, with the top ten at 26.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IXUS or URTH?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IXUS returned +22.2% and URTH returned +17.4%, so IXUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IXUS or URTH?
IXUS charges 0.07% a year and URTH charges 0.24%, so IXUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IXUS and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IXUS and 70% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 27% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IXUS against URTH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IXUS against URTH, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ixus-vs-urth Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources