Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MAGS vs VPL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MAGS returned +5.8% to VPL's +24.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MAGS and VPL

Net assets: $5.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF, and $9.0bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF.

At a glance
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
+24.8%
VPL total return, 1 year
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio
0.07%
VPL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VPL costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.0 points.

MAGS vs VPL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMAGSVPL
Return
Total return, 1 year+5.8%+24.8%
Drawdown
Below its high4.1%, high on Oct 13, 20267.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedFTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.30%0.07%
Net assets, MAGS as of Oct 28, 2026 and VPL as of Sep 30, 2026$5.5bn$9.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.3%24.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and VPL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MAGS VPL
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
NVIDIA Corp 3.52%
Apple Inc 3.49%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48%
Tesla Inc 3.45%
Microsoft Corp 3.07%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 2.45%
Only in VPL
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 7.11%
SK hynix Inc 5.82%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 1.98%
BHP Group Ltd 1.69%
SLBBH1142 1.57%
Toyota Motor Corp 1.51%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia 1.37%
Tokyo Electron Ltd 1.30%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Pacific Stock
Total return, 1 year +5.8% +24.8%
Expense ratio 0.30% 0.07%
Already in the S&P 500 22.5% 0.0%
Holdings 8 2343
Net assets, MAGS as of Oct 28, 2026 and VPL as of Sep 30, 2026 $5.5bn $9.0bn

MAGS and VPL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

MAGS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VPL

VPL tracks an index of Pacific Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,343 positions, with the top ten at 24.8%. It sat 7.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or VPL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +5.8% and VPL +24.8%.
Which is cheaper, MAGS or VPL?
VPL is cheaper, by 0.23 percentage points a year. That is about $23 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MAGS and VPL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 22% of MAGS and 0% of VPL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MAGS against VPL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-vpl

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.