Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FBCG vs VPL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FBCG returned +9.5% to VPL's +24.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FBCG and VPL

Net assets on Sep 30, 2026: $7.6bn for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and $9.0bn for Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF.

At a glance
+9.5%
FBCG total return, 1 year
+24.8%
VPL total return, 1 year
0.57%
FBCG expense ratio
0.07%
VPL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VPL costs 0.50 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.3 points; VPL is 1.2 times larger.

FBCG vs VPL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGVPL
Return
Total return, 1 year+9.5%+24.8%
Drawdown
Below its high5.7%, high on Oct 6, 20267.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedFTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.57%0.07%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$7.6bn$9.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.2%24.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and VPL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FBCG VPL
SK HYNIX INC 0.35% 5.82%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FBCG
NVIDIA CORP 14.90%
APPLE INC 9.31%
ALPHABET INC 9.27%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.86%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.94%
BROADCOM INC 4.38%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.71%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.31%
Only in VPL
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 7.11%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 1.98%
BHP Group Ltd 1.69%
SLBBH1142 1.57%
Toyota Motor Corp 1.51%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia 1.37%
Tokyo Electron Ltd 1.30%
Advantest Corp 1.25%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Pacific Stock
Total return, 1 year +9.5% +24.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −4.2 pts vs VOO not measured
Expense ratio 0.57% 0.07%
Already in the S&P 500 85.3% 0.0%
Holdings 230 2343
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 $7.6bn $9.0bn

FBCG and VPL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FBCG

FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VPL

VPL tracks an index of Pacific Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,343 positions, with the top ten at 24.8%. It sat 7.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or VPL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +9.5% and VPL +24.8%.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or VPL?
VPL is cheaper, by 0.50 percentage points a year. That is about $50 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and VPL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of FBCG and 0% of VPL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FBCG against VPL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-vpl

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.