Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWT vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWT returned +69.9% to MAGS's +5.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWT and MAGS

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $12.0bn for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF and $5.5bn for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

At a glance
+69.9%
EWT total return, 1 year
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
0.59%
EWT expense ratio
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MAGS costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 64.1 points; EWT is 2.2 times larger.

EWT vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWTMAGS
Return
Total return, 1 year+69.9%+5.8%
Drawdown
Below its high7.7%, high on Oct 5, 20264.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Taiwan 25/50 IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.30%
Net assets$12.0bn$5.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund47.7%29.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWT and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWT MAGS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWT
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 22.12%
MEDIATEK 6.03%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 3.31%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 3.25%
ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING 2.86%
NAN YA PLASTICS CORP 2.54%
UNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY 2.04%
ELITE MATERIAL 1.88%
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
NVIDIA Corp 3.52%
Apple Inc 3.49%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48%
Tesla Inc 3.45%
Microsoft Corp 3.07%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 2.45%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Taiwan Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +69.9% +5.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +53.6 pts vs EEM not measured
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.30%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 22.5%
Holdings 79 8
Net assets $12.0bn $5.5bn

EWT and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EWT and MAGS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWT

EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +69.9% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 79 positions, with the top ten at 47.7%. It sat 7.7% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWT or MAGS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +69.9% and MAGS +5.8%.
Which is cheaper, EWT or MAGS?
MAGS is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWT and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWT and 22% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWT against MAGS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-mags

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.