Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
ILF vs MAGS: how they differ
ILF and MAGS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ILF returned more over the year.
iShares Latin America 40 ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ILF and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ILF | Only in MAGS |
|---|---|
| NU HOLDINGS CLASS A 8.61% | TREASURY BILL 65.41% |
| VALE ADR REPRESENTING ONE 8.00% | Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% |
| ITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING ADR REP PRE 6.71% | NVIDIA Corp 4.15% |
| PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG PRE 6.33% | Apple Inc 4.12% |
| GRUPO MEXICO B 6.02% | Amazon.com Inc 4.11% |
| PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG SA 5.94% | Tesla Inc 4.07% |
| GPO FINANCE BANORTE 4.24% | Microsoft Corp 3.62% |
| CREDICORP LTD 3.85% | Meta Platforms Inc 3.59% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| ILF iShares Latin America 40 ETF | MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Roundhill |
| What it is | Latin America 40 | Magnificent Seven |
| Total return, 1 year | +33.4% | +14.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +15.9 pts | −3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.30% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 26.5% |
| Holdings | 47 | 9 |
ILF in plain words
ILF is an index equity fund tracking the Latin America 40. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +33.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 47 positions, with the top ten at 55.7%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Apr 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ILF or MAGS?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILF returned +33.4% and MAGS returned +14.4%, so ILF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, ILF or MAGS?
- ILF charges 0.47% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so MAGS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do ILF and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ILF and 26% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ILF against MAGS, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilf-vs-mags Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources