Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AGG vs ILF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AGG returned −1.4% to ILF's +17.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AGG and ILF

Net assets: $139.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF, and $3.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Latin America 40 ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
AGG total return, 1 year
+17.2%
ILF total return, 1 year
0.03%
AGG expense ratio
0.47%
ILF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

AGG costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 18.6 points; AGG is far larger, $139.4bn against $3.5bn.

AGG vs ILF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAGGILF
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+17.2%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Aug 4, 202013.7%, high on Oct 12, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond IndexS&P Latin America 40
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.47%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$139.4bn$3.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund55.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, AGG and ILF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AGG ILF
Only in one fund ↓
Only in AGG
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 3.02%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE (OLD) 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.38%
Only in ILF
NU HOLDINGS CLASS A 7.53%
PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG PRE 6.95%
ITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING ADR REP PRE 6.61%
PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG SA 6.61%
VALE ADR REPRESENTING ONE 6.45%
GRUPO MEXICO B 6.26%
GPO FINANCE BANORTE 4.48%
CREDICORP LTD 3.96%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF ILF iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Tracks an index of Latin America 40
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +17.2%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.3% (SCHZ) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs SCHZ not measured
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.47%
Holdings 13469 46
Net assets, AGG as of Oct 27, 2026 and ILF as of Oct 28, 2026 $139.4bn $3.5bn

AGG and ILF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

AGG and ILF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AGG

AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

ILF

ILF tracks an index of Latin America 40. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 46 positions, with the top ten at 55.6%. It sat 13.7% below its high of Oct 12, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AGG or ILF?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −1.4% and ILF +17.2%.
Which is cheaper, AGG or ILF?
AGG is cheaper, by 0.44 percentage points a year. That is about $44 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AGG against ILF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-ilf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.